All of Us
2 Peter 1:16-21
Shining with the glory of God
1:16 For we did not follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we had been eyewitnesses of his majesty.
1:17 For he received honor and glory from God the Father when that voice was conveyed to him by the Majestic Glory, saying, "This is my Son, my Beloved, with whom I am well pleased."
1:18 We ourselves heard this voice come from heaven, while we were with him on the holy mountain.
1:19 So we have the prophetic message more fully confirmed. You will do well to be attentive to this as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.
1:20 First of all you must understand this, that no prophecy of scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation,
1:21 because no prophecy ever came by human will, but men and women moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God.
I have always ascribed to the scholars’ idea that the Petrine epistles are remembered/transcribed sermons, possibly by Peter, although I seem to recall that most “Bible guys” give the letters too late a date for that to be true. They certainly could be messages by one of Peter’s younger charges, though. I can “hear” Peter’s voice in these letters, at least the enthusiasm and temperament of the “Peter” we read of in the Gospels. Like so much of the Bible, though, it really doesn’t matter a great deal. This is the canon we have, and the Bible with which we must wrestle, interpret, and preach, so there you have it. And the Petrine letters are chockful of stuff worth wrestling with, all kind of jammed in there together—much like most of our sermons, wouldn’t you say?
Therefore, let’s start with the last two verses of this passage, since they have to do with the very idea of scriptural interpretation. As an immature, Christian youth, I remember thinking these verses were telling us that, ultimately, it would be the Holy Spirit that would have to help us understand what scripture means, since the Holy Spirit was the “inspirer” of them, in the first place. Remembering how my various literature teachers used to go into long excurses about what William Shakespeare really “meant” with his flowery prose, I used to think, “Wouldn’t it be cool if we could actually ASK Bill Shakespeare what he meant? Wouldn’t that end the sometimes wide-a-field speculation?
One of my favorite scenes in Woody Allen’s Oscar-winning film, “Annie Hall” happens when he is standing in line with Diane Keaton, waiting to get into a movie. A man behind him is “pontificating” to his date about the “depth of meaning” in this film and all kinds of other artful media expressions from film to television. Allen eventually “has enough” of what he believes is just pseudointellectual babble, and when the man moves on to express his opinions regarding media scholar Marshall McLuhan’s work, Allen openly expresses his displeasure. The man reacts by stating that he “teaches a course” at Columbia on modern media, which he believes elevates him to the level of expert, especially on the work of McLuhan. Allen responds, “Oh YEAH, well…” and he reaches off camera and tows in the REAL Marshall McLuhan, who denigrates the man’s lack of knowledge of his work, putting him in his place. Allen then breaks character again, looks directly into the camera, and speaks: “Don’t you wish REAL LIFE were like this?” Kind of my idea about trusting that if the Holy Spirit is the true inspiration behind what we read in the Bible, then the Holy Spirit should be “patient zero” in our efforts to interpret it.
Not so easy, is it? Don’t we ALL have our own ideas about how the Spirit “speaks” to us? Some of us talk of the “still, small voice,” while others rise in public worship and spew long speeches in “tongues,” awaiting an interpretation, in the full believe that we have just regurgitated an actual, in-real-time message DIRECTLY from the Holy Spirit. How in the world can either of these “voices” be trusted to give us the unarguable “interpretation” of something from the Bible? See the problem with expecting the Holy Spirit to be Marshall McLuhan, waiting just off camera to be consulted?
AND, even IF we could tap the Holy Ghost as a resource, we still have to deal with the “living” nature of scripture. I have come to believe this means that the Bible CAN be interpreted “freshly” for each time and era, and that it can mean different things to different people, consulting it for different reasons. Is this what the Petrine voice (which I’ll now refer to simply as “Peter” to keep the narrative easier to follow) is trying to tell us in these verses? Is Peter saying that, since the Holy Spirit “inspired” these words, desiring them to have universal, not time-locked, meaning, we are FREE to interpret their meaning for what we are facing, at any given time, both as individual Christians, and as the church? I believe the author is amplifying this assertion by stating in verse 20, that there IS no “one person’s interpretation” that can be said to be exhaustively “right.” The texts of scripture are for ALL people, for ALL time, and may have a VARIETY of interpretations, as led by the Spirit in kairos time, and as called upon by the zeitgeist. In other words, even if we are somewhat successful at deducing what a given text meant when it was first written, it is true that its meaning in the current era may be different, or at least apply differently, because history, circumstances, and WE have changed. What ALL of us should affirm together is that the scriptures HAVE MEANING for us, and are “inspired by God and are useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in right living.” I’ve heard that somewhere. What we ALL can affirm is the value of the Holy Bible for our individual and corporate “wrestling matches” over its meaning. No ONE can say “Here’s exactly what this means for all of us.” It just doesn’t work that way. Never has. If you don’t believe that, just pick up a good text on church history. We can see things so very differently, depending on our perspective, our need, and our OWN history, can’t we. Another case in point…
Recently, the nation has been doing its “dividing” thing over a Super Bowl halftime show by the Puerto Rican musical star, “Bad Bunny” (real name: Benito Antonio Martinez Ocasio.) Some people felt his show was obscene, while others of us thought It was artistic and amazing. Some felt it was divisive and “political,” while most of us saw it as celebrating American inclusivity, unity, and love. Some pontificated that “only Americans should be performing at the Super Bowl,” while others pointed out that, as a native-born Puerto Rican, Mr. Bunny IS an American. Discounting the actual factual correction stated in the last postulate, it should be clear that different audiences can see the same show and come away with entirely different meanings and opinions about it. We should be able to agree on the facts, even if that is the only thing, but the context we are in currently even puts these in dispute, so let’s move on.
One more assertion I need to make, concerning what Peter tells us in these last two verses: “scriptural authority” does not mean that there is one single “interpretation” of scripture that is absolutely, unarguably correct. It just means that we agree that the Bible is the “one book” Christians have as our common source of faith, guidance, and life. We are clearly free to take different meanings away from it, as the Holy Spirit inspires. The closest parallel I can think of from secular history is the Constitution of the United States of America. It is AUTHORITATIVE because it was made so by the founders, and as properly amended through our history. Would anyone argue, though, that any part of it has one, clear INTERPRETATION? History has proved this wrong, as well, as Supreme Courts have shifted gears on its meaning multiple time. Its interpretation and meaning, whilst varied, do not reduce its authority. The preamble begins with the main thing: “We the people.” We’re in this together. Ultimately, our “divisions” shouldn’t matter. Later, regarding God’s heartfelt desire in giving us Jesus and the Word of God, Peter will tell us that God wishes that “none should perish.” WE are in this together, and this is the main thing that we should keep the main thing. If it isn’t about ALL of us, then none of us is safe.
While there is a lot of good stuff in this passage, I want to close with one phrase that keeps haunting me in this time of disaffiliations, division, and downright nasty badgering between factions, of which I confess I’ve been quite caught up in, frankly. Peter uses the phrase in verse 19 of “a lamp shining in a dark place.” He refers here to “prophecy,” but given the wider context of the passage, I believe he is speaking of the Word of God, namely Jesus Christ, himself. And as “ambassadors for Christ,” we are being challenged to keep this lamp shining. It is clear that the “dark places” do not go away just by the clock ticks of history. We are in one right now, both in the church AND in American society. One message that can be universally accepted if we preach it right is this “ALL of us” message. And yes, this is a follow up on my “All for One, One for All” message of a couple of weeks ago. Can we at least agree that there is ONE God, one faith, one baptism, one Lord of us all in the Christian church? (And “one nation under God,” if you want to stretch this to patriotism?) Is this not the “main thing”? I would argue that both the Word of God and the U.S. Constitution are here to draw believers (and patriots) into single communities, where mutual respect and the “common good” are perfected and practiced. Whenever one person or one faction believes it has the “ultimate truth,” this kind of unity is not only threatened, but probably impossible. We’re very close to this right now.
I encourage us to bring out those lamps, for only light can drive out darkness, and only love can drive out hate. I’ve heard that somewhere, too. Jesus told us “a house divided against itself will not stand.” And for we patriots, Benjamin Franklin said, “We must all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately.” Both were right, and should be passionately heeded by those of us with the lamps. Amen.




