America's Got Talents

 

America’s Got Talents!

 

Matthew 25:14-30

Slaves entrusted with talents 

 

25:14 "For it is as if a man, going on a journey, summoned his slaves and entrusted his property to them;

 

25:15 to one he gave five talents, to another two, to another one, to each according to his ability. Then he went away. At once

 

25:16 the one who had received the five talents went off and traded with them, and made five more talents.

 

25:17 In the same way, the one who had the two talents made two more talents.

 

25:18 But the one who had received the one talent went off and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master's money.

 

25:19 After a long time the master of those slaves came and settled accounts with them.

 

25:20 Then the one who had received the five talents came forward, bringing five more talents, saying, 'Master, you handed over to me five talents; see, I have made five more talents.'

 

25:21 His master said to him, 'Well done, good and trustworthy slave; you have been trustworthy in a few things; I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.'

 

25:22 And the one with the two talents also came forward, saying, 'Master, you handed over to me two talents; see, I have made two more talents.'

 

25:23 His master said to him, 'Well done, good and trustworthy slave; you have been trustworthy in a few things; I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.'

 

25:24 Then the one who had received the one talent also came forward, saying, 'Master, I knew that you were a harsh man, reaping where you did not sow and gathering where you did not scatter,

 

25:25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here you have what is yours.'

 

25:26 But his master replied, 'You wicked and lazy slave! You knew, did you, that I reap where I did not sow and gather where I did not scatter?

 

25:27 Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and on my return I would have received what was my own with interest.

 

 

Those TV shows that give “amateurs” a chance to showcase their talents, ranging from singing to magic acts that spellbind, have become all the rage. Now, to some degree, they always have. When I was a kid, “Ted Mack’s Original Amateur Hour,” had made the jump to TV from a radio beginning. It had the same MO as today’s “America’s Got Talent” or “American Idol,” offering aspiring artists a chance to “make it big” by catching the hearts of a viewing audience. Ted Mack was one of the first, though, and here is a short list of the “talent” that got its nod from The Original Amateur Hour and went on to bigger things: Frank Sinatra; Gladys Knight; Pat Boone; Ann-Margaret; Jose Feliciano; and Tanya Tucker. In our time, most everyone remembers that frumpy gal from Scotland who appeared on “Britian’s Got Talent.” Her name, Susan Boyle, became an internet darling, and almost everyone knows her fame, that began a few notes into “I Dreamed a Dream.” Other than the hopes of the hopeless millions who play the lottery every week, and who “just know” they will win the big prize, someday, there are also countless thousands who believe that some “talent” they have may someday find a stage on which to be “discovered.” 

 

A few years ago, I read of a young, African American student at Columbia University who would regularly sign up to be cast as an “extra” in movies being filmed in New York, mostly just to get a check to help pay his huge cell phone bill (he had a girlfriend out of state). His name was Rob Brown, and one day he signed up to audition as one of those nameless “throngs” called “extras” in an upcoming film named “Finding Forrester,” staring none other than Sean Connery. He made the second casting call, and was shocked to be personally greeted by the director of the film, Gus Van Sant, when he arrived. Van Sant put him in an empty, generic room with two chairs, and said he would be reading with another person, for this second stage of the audition. Brown was even more shocked when the “other person” entered the room, and it was Connery, himself. Little did Brown know that Van Sant was looking for a “new face” to be the co-star of the film, Connery liked him, and he got the part. If you’ve never seen “Finding Forrester,” it’s a wonderful film, and its plot mirrors Rob Brown’s real-life story, as it turns out! Here’s yet another example of someone who put forth his talent, albeit initially just to pay his cell phone bill, and wound up “striking it rich” by catching the attention of powerful people. And while it seems like it happens all the time, remember—we only hear the success stories. 

 

Years ago, when I was working as the director of a small, local public access TV organization, we had a young man sing and play guitar on our fund-raising telethon. He was quite talented, played and sang very well, had the “looks” to potentially be a star, but he had one flaw—he sounded just like Kenny Rogers. While that was quite entertaining—some might even say “moving”—to a local TV audience, it proved to be a detriment to him trying to foster a career beyond the local lounge scene. If people wanted Kenny Rogers, they would buy Kenny Rogers CDs (remember, this was about three decades ago). As it turns out, being “an original” AND talented goes a whole lot farther when trying to “break in” to any field of entertainment. 

 

Sometimes, the “kingmakers” who seem to hover around society have their own ideas about whom they might want to “puff” and why. Oh, that word “puff” brings another story to mind. I’ll get to it in a moment. When I was just a “young pup” pastor in the UMC, there were a few “kingmakers” who wanted to push me to play the politics necessary to “get ahead” in ministry. (Yes, there ARE these same power-seeking, political people in the church. Surprised? You shouldn’t be. James Carville, the acerbic and outspoken Democratic “kingmaker” was once asked where he learned his brand of cutthroat politics, and he immediately responded, “In the CHURCH!) Anyway, these well-meaning folk had decided I might be a “good horse to back,” and they encouraged me to take many “stage grabbing” steps in the Annual Conference, and were quite disappointed when I balked at the idea. Not that I’m not a political person—those of you who have seen some of my “political activism” posts on Facebook know better—but I had no interest in “playing politics” in the church. I spent my ministerial career trying to be faithful to my calling, joyously and faithfully serving my people, and advancing the Good News of Jesus Christ. That sounds rather high and lofty, and trust me, I often failed at using my “talents” in the most productive and effective ways! But my aim was to do so, even when I was found wanting. I often imagine some of those early Methodist “kingmakers” saying, “Ya coulda’ been a contenda’, kid…” If there is one thing I am most proud of in what I DID accomplish in ministry, it was that I never gave up on being a well-educated, “life-long learner,” AND that my team and I were able to successfully navigate St. Paul’s UMC safely through the COVID pandemic, with them even coming out stronger on the “other side” of that horrible experience.

 

Back to the “puff” story. Decades ago, the wife of newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst was invited to a big “tent revival” in the Los Angeles area. She came home with a renewed faith and much excitement for the handsome, animated young evangelist who preached, named Billy Graham. After excitedly telling her husband about the experience, Hearst picked up the phone and told his editor at the Los Angeles Times, “Puff Graham.” The rest, as they say, is history.

 

I know, this is an incredibly long introduction for a message on Jesus’ parable of the talents, as it is known, but I hope these stories do set up the punchline for this parable. If you don’t know this story, where have you been, Beloved? Basically, it is story of stewardship and risk. The “man” takes the risk of entrusting his funds to three people. The inference is that they are given what would amount to his “401k” to manage, in his absence. It is important to note that he is both a risk-taker, in this regard, and yet a prudent man. He gave more than 50% of his money to the first man, because he believes this man has the most “talent” to manage it appropriately. However, he still has trust in guy number two, and gives him a substantial amount to “invest.” Finally, he picks a third servant that, in his opinion, made the “talent cut,” and yet barely, so he gets the smallest amount. The first guy pulls a Susan Boyle, and gets a 100% profit on the original five “talents.” The last guy pulls a “Kenny Rogers wannabe,” applying the paradigm of fear to the situation, and he tries nothing original, at all. Even beggars know that burying your loot will “keep it safe,” with little knowledge or regard for how to use the market to create more wealth. When the man returns, he’s quite happy with the first two guys who double his money, but he’s not at all happy with the one who just “warehouses” it while he is away, letting fear guide his steps. There are few fields of endeavor where “fear” is a good motivator, and the more dangerous or risky a task is, the less “fear” should be the main factor in how to proceed. Oh, sure, “fear” may temper ignorance AND foolish, ill-advised steps, but as a primary motivation, it is always lacking, even totally stifling, as was the case of the third guy in the parable. 

 

I submit that the real hero of this story—other than the man who decides to trust his servants with so much of his wealth—is the second man. He only gets two “talents,” for that is all his boss felt he could handle. It’s clear that he had not yet adequately proved himself, but he comes through with shining colors. He, too, doubles what he had been given. I further submit that many of us might be this “second guy,” in that we DO have the “talent” to do extraordinary things, but haven’t yet proved ourselves as “worthy.” “Second guys” can be quite valuable, as they tend to be looking for opportunities to shine, and they often harbor a sober view of what they can and can’t do. When given the chance, they will give it their all, and may even summon up talents even THEY didn’t know they had. Again, all of this is quite valuable to whatever “community” they may be addressing. During my years in ministry, I often spent time seeking out these “second guys” (and please note that I’m using the term “guy” inclusively, as it often is in the contemporary lexicon, and not just meaning “men), and doing my best to “puff” them to new opportunities to prove themselves and be recognized by the “powers that be.” I did my best to encourage them, and to be one of their “cheerleaders” out in the broader church. I don’t ultimately know how effective I was at doing this, but I expect that when our “master” returns, I might get an accounting as to how many “talents” I successfully “multiplied.”

 

The danger for the “middle guy” is falling off the “fear” ledge, while trying to decide how to apply their talents. The first guy in the parable appears fearless, just doing what the master in the story KNEW he would. The last guy, as we know, was totally paralyzed by his fear, and I’m guessing he was in for a reward that involved darkness and gnashing of teeth. The “second guy” had everything he needed to succeed in the task for which he was called. All he needed to do was “put it in gear” and do it. Trouble was, fears circled around him, since he had not yet proved himself, at least to the degree that his master was willing to take too much of a risk on his abilities. Let’s say that for him, this whole exercise was a “test.” If he gave in to the readily-available cloud of “fears” that circled above, he could have been in the same boat as the third guy, but with double the losses. If, however, he put his “talents” to work and multiplied his master’s “talents,” he might have found himself exalted and promoted by the boss. 

 

So, there you have it. America—and the church of Jesus Christ—DOES have talent, but it’s only as good as what we make of it. Which “guy” are you? Amen.

LISTEN to this message...

All Ears

All Ears

 

Psalm 78:1-7

The power of God 

 

78:1 Give ear, O my people, to my teaching; incline your ears to the words of my mouth.

 

78:2 I will open my mouth in a parable; I will utter dark sayings from of old,

 

78:3 things that we have heard and known, that our ancestors have told us.

 

78:4 We will not hide them from their children; we will tell to the coming generation the glorious deeds of the LORD and the Lord’s might and the wonders that the Lord has done.

 

78:5 God established a decree in Jacob and appointed a law in Israel, which God commanded our ancestors to teach to their children,

 

78:6 that the next generation might know them, the children yet unborn, and rise up and tell them to their children,

 

78:7 so that they should set their hope in God, and not forget the works of God, but keep God’s commandments.

 

 

Remember when Jesus said things like, “The one who has ears, let them hear”? Or how about how this passage from Psalm 78 that reminds us to “Give ear, O my people”? It continues: “…incline your ears to the words of my mouth.” There is something about “hearing” stuff that resonates with the writers of holy scripture, and possibly we should “incline our ears” to hear what they are telling us! Isn’t it amazing that after so many generations of sermons from the pulpit, it is still the “preferred” way to hear religious teachings, even in an age of multi-media, social media, and just plain MEDIA EVERYWHERE? I have been writing my “retirement sermons” every single week since I retired back in July of 2021, and publishing them to my blog at www.sterlings.org, but I find it interesting that a couple of my former charges actually asked if I would be willing to record them audibly and put the link on the blog entry. They wanted to “hear” what I had to say, not read it. (I did start doing this, by the way, which has also given me a different perspective on these “written” messages. When I was in active ministry, I did not preach from a manuscript like I have been writing, and “reading” my current text into a microphone has twisted my brain around a bit, but in a helpful way…I think.)

 

Speaking of my preaching, I always wrote fresh, weekly sermons for the “time and the place” that was my current congregation, at the time. My theology of preaching is that the sermon is to be more of an “event” wherein the Holy Spirit of God can weave the words of the scriptures together with the contemporary thoughts and ruminations of the preacher, to address the timely needs of the “hearers.” This is one of the reasons I constructed a weekly “outline” of what I believed I was going to say, based on my study of the passage in question, AND on my observations of what was happening in the church and the world, at that time. This was my own version of that “Bible in one hand and the morning newspaper in the other” statement, often attributed to Karl Barth. Also, working from an outline kept me from the temptation of archiving a manuscript, which I feared I might “dip into” in an overly busy or stressful week. I now find it interesting that, since I AM now writing manuscripts on a weekly basis, when I AM called upon to preach for a colleague, I must “backwards engineer” my sermon for a public hearing, which is a challenge in its own right. One of the reasons I preached without a net was that I wanted to look into the eyes of my congregation, not only to keep their attention, but to gauge what was resonating with them. I was always prepared to add more material, when something seemed to be grabbing them, in a given topic of the sermon. (I learned from homiletics professor Dr. Eugene Lowry that the sermon is like going on a trip: when you see something interesting along the way, you stop the car and get out to take a look; then you get back into the car and continue along your way. This image worked well for me and my tendency to take those little “excurses” during a sermon, but I must admit, that like most preachers, I often had a hard time knowing when the journey was over and it was time to park the car.)

 

The Bible is right: HEARING is an important way to assimilate information and to get new insights into the brain. The “ear-gate,” as some say, is an important connection. After all, do we just sit and stare at a piece of sheet music, or do we listen to our favorite tunes? As a fan of reading novels or stories that get made into films, I love to see how the film portrays what was on the written page. Often, a simple scene may adequately communicate something that the author took three pages to describe. So it is with good preaching. I say “good” preaching, because there is also BAD preaching. Personally, I would diagnose “bad” preaching as that which either relies too heavily on the scripture text as written, hammering it home as a “command” or a dogmatic rule, or preaching that totally ignores the needs of the people present, as well as the context in which they are living. This is why I was never a fan of pulling sermons “out of the barrel” when moving to a new congregation, who had never heard them before, which seems to commit both of these “sins.” Arriving at a new congregation is a PERFECT time to begin assessing the needs of these “new” people and working ASAP to connect with them—with integrity—from the pulpit. I found that when making that initial connection with a new congregation, “hearing is believing” came into play.

 

“Hearing” can happen on many levels. “The one who has ears to hear” may be simply understood as meaning, “Are you paying attention to the message, here?” It can also address the “listener” having the necessary tools to hear, interpret, and deduce, followed by the desire to follow through on what is heard and perceived. This is always the challenge of the pulpit preacher—connecting with both the “aware and alert” folk, such as these, while not leaving behind the ones who are either lacking these interpretive skills, and/or who are distracted by other, more immediate concerns than “What does the Bible say?” Stories are the great equalizer, which is why the great rabbis of history, Jesus himself, and the notable preachers USE them to embody lessons. When asked “Who is my neighbor,” Jesus could have gone into a five-minute legal definition of what constitutes a “neighbor,” and how one knows they need our help. It would have made for a dull exchange, and certainly would have fallen on deaf ears in his day, and would have most likely been exorcised from the pages of holy writ by later redactors, if not left out at the get-go by the one penning the gospel. No, instead, he told a story, one that makes anyone’s “greatest hits” list of parabolic tales—“The Good Samaritan,” usually equated with the one we call, “The Prodigal Son,” or “The Loving Father.” The story not only all ears, regardless of their state of preparedness, but it actually carries the mail. Most of us preachers don’t have that kind of verbal dexterity, but a story that wakes up lethargic ears gets the job done. 

 

Two other important issues in this “lend me your ears” concept are “tonal integrity” and attribution. Tonal integrity has to do with sounding like yourself. Now I’m not taking aim at cultural or ethnic differences in homiletical style, as in these other contexts, a dramatic or heavily modulated voice performs a similar task that does a story. It gets attention, signals that something important is coming, and prepares the ears of the listener to filter the appropriate truth out of what is coming next. However, for most of us in the majority culture, tonal integrity means eschewing this kind of verbal pulsing. When I answered my call to ministry, my wife became my best preaching critic, as she (and we) had been privileged to sit under some very good preaching in the two churches we had attended in our lives, to that point. After a few short weeks of preaching in my first pulpit, she gave me her analysis, and it was good news: you sound like yourself (tonal integrity); your content is decent (you perked up my ears adequately); and you let me know where you got your insights (attribution). Occasionally, as I matriculated through seminary homiletics classes, I’d try some new idea out, or sneak in a “style change,” to see if it worked for me. Her usual comment was, “You know that thing you did today with the sermon? Don’t ever do that again.” For her—and for must “inquiring ears”—that personal integrity in the pulpit thing means a lot. If it doesn’t sound like “you,” then it doesn’t come across as authentic to people. They’ll just shut their ears on you.

 

As Columbo would say, “Just one more thing…” Remember that old expression, “Dance with the one that brung you”? Do so in your preaching, and you’ll likely have their ears to hear you. As a member of a congregation on the listening end, offer your pastor meaningful feedback when you hear the Holy Spirit moving in what they tell you or teach you. Preachers, don’t try to be clever, but DO pray through the preparation of your message, and ask the Holy Spirit to “quicken” your words like Jesus raised Lazarus! There is a “wavelength” to preaching the message that God wants you to bring forth, and finding out how to tune that in is the most important element in writing a message that will fall on fertile “ears.” I read an incredible story in Apple News this week. It was about a 62-year-old man named Edward Freytag. He was a professional musician and music teacher/composer, but he got into a fairly serious motorcycle accident and had a resulting head injury. As he began to respond to treatment in the hospital, he began composing musical pieces on his laptop computer. He also found himself with two new “miraculous” skills: he suddenly had “perfect pitch,” meaning he could hear and even “see” notes clearly, and knew their pitch, instantly; and he could listen to a complex jazz piece and immediately write down its score, including highly complex chord structures. As he continued his recovery, his ability to compose the kinds of amazing pieces he found on his computer—one piece called “Brain Bleed,” and the other, “Previous Knowledge,” began to wane. I’ve been listening to these two pieces of music and they are indescribable. He is convinced that his injury tapped him into some “stream” of extreme creativity, which kind of “co-authored” the jazz pieces in question, and I would agree. Did he possibly log into the “quantum rhythm” behind all of the created order? Kind of like what must have happened to Mozart and the Beatles, I would guess. My thought was that this quantum rhythm that science tells us actually “forms” the reality we experience IS what the scriptures tell us is the Holy Spirit of God. I’m not suggesting that we should go out and bang our heads on the pavement to get inspired for sermon crafting, but wouldn’t it be wonderful if we COULD culture the sensitivity to this “flow” of what God is up to, such that we could tap it to bring power, relevance, and practicality to our preaching? And what of the ears of our listeners? Might they be able to tap this same “Spirit Stream” to “hear between the lines” of what we are saying, such that they hear what they NEED to hear from our messages, and not just what we “want” them to hear? Even as Mr. Freytag experienced, meaning can be an interactive and empowered element to “hearing.” By believing that God DOES want to speak to us—both as preachers and as congregations—we are taking the first step in priming the message to get across, so that “those who have ears may hear.” The writer of this Psalm is so concerned that the “story of God and God’s people” may not be lost on deaf ears. We should be, too, Dear Ones. Preachers, do your due diligence in preparation, find the “flow” of the quantum rhythm behind the scriptures, your message, and the ears of your listeners, and expect the “connection” to be transformational for all parties involved! Amen. 

LISTEN to this message...

Ark vs. Arc

 

Ark vs. Arc

 

Joshua 3:7-17

Crossing into the promised land 

 

3:7 The LORD said to Joshua, "This day I will begin to exalt you in the sight of all Israel, so that they may know that I will be with you as I was with Moses.

 

3:8 You are the one who shall command the priests who bear the ark of the covenant, 'When you come to the edge of the waters of the Jordan, you shall stand still in the Jordan.'"

 

3:9 Joshua then said to the Israelites, "Draw near and hear the words of the LORD your God."

 

3:10 Joshua said, "By this you shall know that among you is the living God who without fail will drive out from before you the Canaanites, Hittites, Hivites, Perizzites, Girgashites, Amorites, and Jebusites:

 

3:11 the ark of the covenant of the Lord of all the earth is going to pass before you into the Jordan.

 

3:12 So now select twelve men from the tribes of Israel, one from each tribe.

 

3:13 When the soles of the feet of the priests who bear the ark of the LORD, the Lord of all the earth, come to rest in the waters of the Jordan, the waters of the Jordan flowing from above shall be cut off; they shall stand in a single heap."

 

3:14 When the people set out from their tents to cross over the Jordan, the priests bearing the ark of the covenant were in front of the people.

 

3:15 Now the Jordan overflows all its banks throughout the time of harvest. So when those who bore the ark had come to the Jordan and the feet of the priests bearing the ark were dipped in the edge of the water,

 

3:16 the waters flowing from above stood still, rising up in a single heap far off at Adam, the city that is beside Zarethan, while those flowing toward the sea of the Arabah, the Dead Sea, were wholly cut off. Then the people crossed over opposite Jericho. 

 

3:17 While all Israel were crossing over on dry ground, the priests who bore the ark of the covenant of the LORD stood firmly on dry ground in the middle of the Jordan, until the entire nation finished crossing over the Jordan.

 

 

EVERYBODY knows who “Indiana Jones” is: Hans Solo in a honey of a hat; a man afraid of nothing…except snakes; a-religious, but spends his screen time looking for artifacts all ABOUT faith. What a guy. Of course, this character moved to movie prominence by chasing the Ark of the Covenant in the first film, “Raiders of the Lost Ark.” I’ve seen it well over a dozen times, and still get a kick out of it. Harrison Ford is the Sean Connery of Generation X, and who but Spielberg could put them together in the third film, “Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade”? In case you’re wondering, “Raiders” is my favorite of the films, and the last two, my least favorite. “Crusade” is second on the list. I’d say this introductory material on this latest sermon is “just for free” and has nothing to do with my message, but actually, it does. The “Ark mystique” is what brought Indiana Jones to life, and it still occupies much of the weirdness surrounding what some people find worthy of pondering.

 

Those of you who grew up on the little painted chairs of the Sunday School room know the basics about the actual Ark of the Covenant found in the pages of scripture. This was the “box” that God told Moses to build as a carrying case for the stone tablets bearing the Ten Commandments (God’s law), as well as Aaron’s staff that budded, and a jar of manna, to remind Israel of God’s provision. God gave better plans for building the Ark than you get from IKEA, and most Bible scholars who spend time with this stuff say that the depiction of the Ark of the Covenant from the Spielberg film is probably as accurate as we can imagine, which shouldn’t surprise us, given the famous director grew up in the best of Jewish tradition, and has access to as many scholars as he would need. 

 

The “bad guy” archeologist in the film, Rene Belloq, embodies two things that can get God-fearing believers in trouble: he’s a thief for hire; and he has some really weird, “SyFy” ideas about what the Ark is (“a radio transmitter for speaking to God”). While my own “inquiring minds want to know” interests find some of the theories out there about the shroud of Turin, the Ark that Noah supposedly built, and this Ark of the Covenant, interesting, I don’t spend a lot of time ruminating about them, really don’t believe they have much to do with a true faith in Christ, and I certainly don’t chase after finding them, as some have. Honestly, relics such as these, even if they exist and may be found, someday (obviously, the shroud of Turin already has been), they are just that--relics of the past, and it still has a provisional “maybe” about it, if you listen to authentic Bible scholars. In most of my sermons, if you have been reading them, I tend to discount the historicity of these things, in favor of what the stories about them are meant to TEACH us. If someone finds the actual Ark of the Covenant in the dank basement of an Egyptian church someday, no lightning bolts will fly out of it, and it will most likely be as empty as Al Capone’s safe. It’s not a radio transmitter, nor a magic prop. It was a box for keeping God’s law in the midst of God’s people, and the stories surrounding its “magic” are designed to remind us how important it is to know that God is our source, our protector, our loving, heavenly “parent,” and our disciplinarian, especially when we go astray, which might endanger not just ourselves, but the communities with which we affiliate. 

 

Unfortunately, for some, such relics—or potential relics, like the Ark—become a kind of religious talisman which they expect would boost or “assure” their faith, if found. I think Jesus addressed this temptation to put our faith in something tangible when he said to Thomas: “Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.” Again, for Moses and Israel, the Ark was a symbol of God’s presence among the people, and a reminder to keep God’s law, not just because it “pleased God,” but because the law was intended to keep the peace among God’s people, and therefore strengthen their relationships with humans AND with God. 

 

So, do we have objects in our day that, like the Ark of the Covenant, remind us of God’s presence in the world? Some might cite the incredible “works of art” that are the great cathedrals of Europe. Having been to a number of them, I can see that. There is something so majestic about them. One can just sit, take them in, and be amazed. Like a Mozart composition or a Rembrandt painting, they convey the beauty of the artist’s work directly to the heart. Cathedrals speak of the intense creativity of their designers, as well as the countless craftsmen who built them, usually over many decades, and even a century or two. That amazing Sagrada Familia in Barcelona, Spain, designed by Antoni Gaudi, is one of the most inspiring things I’ve ever laid eyes on, and I’ve only seen photos and videos! It is truly transcendent, even more so than a gold-covered storage chest, or a giant boat, in my opinion. And yet, it should only serve to remind and inspire, not be worshiped or venerated, in itself, unless to give thanks for the amazing creativity that brought it to life. 

 

For me, the two things that regularly remind me of God’s presence among humans are not exactly “objects,” but spiritual commands and pursuits—LOVE and JUSTICE. Jesus commanded us to love one another as he loved us. Genuine love transforms and sustains people. It is hard, as I’ve often preached. To “say” I love you is empty unless our level of action, sacrifice, and attention is being demonstrated in an ongoing, edifying relationship with the other. The other sign of both true religion AND an evidence of God’s presence is the insistence of and working for JUSTICE. THIS is the “true arc” that spurs faith and lifts people! I say “arc,” for it comes from a phrase that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. quoted while preaching and working for justice during the civil rights movement of the 1960s: “The moral arc of the universe is long, but it bends toward justice,” a form of which was first attributed to Theodore Parker, a 19^th Century American abolitionist. This “arc” truly is a sign of God’s intent for humanity—justice for all—and requires a joint effort between the Divine and God’s human creation. Justice will not be arrived at on its own, nor will it be dropped on us by God like the manna Israel got for food in the wilderness. As Dr. King said, bending THAT arc will take both work AND sacrifice, the most supreme version of the latter took him from our presence.

 

So, the moral of the message, and today’s text, my friends, is that what we “carry” today as true signs of God’s presence AND our obedience to the commands of Jesus Christ, are LOVE and JUSTICE. If it is true that the moral arc of the universe bends toward justice, it is our task to keep pushing that sucker harder in that direction, and lubricating it with the kind of love that liberates, uplifts, and transforms, beginning with ourselves and extending to our neighbor. Ark vs. Arc? I’ll take the latter. Amen!

LISTEN to this message...

Hang Together or Hang Separately

 

Hang Together, or Hang Separately

 

Matthew 22:34-46

Loving God and neighbor 

 

22:34 When the Pharisees heard that he had silenced the Sadducees, they gathered together,

 

22:35 and one of them, an expert in the law, asked him a question to test him.

 

22:36 "Teacher, which commandment in the law is the greatest?"

 

22:37 He said to him, "'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.'

 

22:38 This is the greatest and first commandment.

 

22:39 And a second is like it: 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.'

 

22:40 On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets."

 

When a lot of our church and family friends heard that Dara and I were moving to a United Methodist retirement community called “Wesbury,” they questioned why we were doing so. I’m 72, Dara is 75, and few people seem to believe we are that old, basing their beliefs on our physical appearance, overall health, and rather ambitious activity level. But we are that old, and unlike many of our friends, we have little family in the region, or at least family that could be part of a “caring network,” should the inevitable effects of aging finally start to come our way (our two adult children live in faraway places). Hence, we decided to put our names on the “waiting list” for a Wesbury “Villa,” which are basically stand-alone, single-story homes of varying sizes, grouped into a “village” Wesbury calls “Thoburn Village,” named after a late United Methodist Bishop. Wesbury is one of those “age in place” facilities, and should we need escalating levels of care, ranging from assisted living to acute care, and even memory care, they have it. Truth be told, Dara wanted to get on Wesbury’s waiting list immediately upon my retirement back in 2021, but I was the holdout. First of all, I liked the Pittsburgh area, and coveted a chance to enjoy our townhouse and its location when I wasn’t responsible for a busy church! Secondly, I must admit, I don’t like the idea of accepting that I AM getting older. Eventually, though, Dara’s better mind won out, and we went on the waiting list about midway through 2022. And after about three and a half years on it, a nice “Villa” came open, and we took it. So now, we are residents of Meadville, PA, just up the road a piece from Allegheny College.

 

Why am I telling you this story? It’s mostly to take yet another tack on fleshing out what is important about “community.” Hillary Clinton made quite a fuss a number of years ago, talking about how it “takes a village” to raise a child well. Well, I would suggest this is true of a good many things in life, including dealing with the “creep” of aging! We now have our “village.” Things at Wesbury are great. Our home is much more safe than a townhouse, which is basically STAIRS, held together by a random assortment of rooms. Thoburn Village has a number of beautiful, wide streets with next to NO car traffic (while not a “gated” community, Wesbury IS private), and ample places to take our daily walks, including a nice little “nature trail,” maintained by the Wesbury Auxiliary. Each month, a rather impressive “menu” of activities and local trips to restaurants and “places to see” is posted, and Thoburn residents can sign up. We do, and have been regulars on the Wesbury “bus” that picks us up at our door and shuttles us to some great venues. We are accompanied by our neighbors and new friends, all of whom share one important quality: they all made the decision to “invest” in being proactive about a place where they can “age in place,” alleviating most of the “fear of the future.” 

 

Our new community of friends is an interesting lot. Most of them were professionals of some sort—teachers, lawyers, clergy, engineers, physicians, bankers, and even a few military career folk. They are indeed an interesting lot, and each is willing to share her or his story, both for the interest of the group, and if something they have learned may be of value to someone else here. This IS a caring community, with an active prayer chain, and some good listening ears. Beyond that, Wesbury has a wonderful staff of activities people and management folk who legitimately care for its residents. We have a fantastic chaplain (an excellent preacher, too!), community rooms, monthly potluck dinners and “birthday bashes,” and rooms designated for various activities, such as an art room, which I frequent. We even have a clubhouse for various gatherings and events, which includes a small “workout” room we can use if the weather keeps us from our regular trips to the downtown YMCA. For us, it has become a kind of “Mecca,” providing spacious living quarters, great new friends, and a wide range of activities, all while giving us the freedom to do what we choose. I’m sure we will find its flaws, as even the best of human community has them, but overall, I have to say that it is “modeling” what a caring community can be. I have to ask myself how we can create more of these in our world. The church SHOULD be one, but obviously this isn’t always the case. And our nation and its geographical communities are so divided now, both politically and fiscally, that it is more true than ever what poet Robert Frost said: “Fences make good neighbors.”

 

Side story: I HAVE discovered one of the flaws of life in Thoburn Village. Each of our “Villas” has a series of fire and smoke sensors hard-wired to the Meadville Fire Department. Thanks to my love of cooking, which often involves stovetop stir-frying, I have had a man in a raincoat with an AX in my kitchen on two occasions, summoned up by overly sensitive electronics, rather than any actual fire or smoke! We’re working on that…

 

I believe it was Benjamin Franklin who, commenting on the Declaration of Independence and the firestorm it would precipitate, said: “Gentlemen, we must hang together, or we will most assuredly hang separately.” While it is on the “dangerous” side of what it means to eschew togetherness and community, he made an important point. Not “hanging together” as a community drawn together by some common pursuit, belief, or practice, can mean something more benign, like loneliness, or just winding up with inadequate resources to meet any goals best tackled with others. America was born of a pioneer “spirit” often labeled “rugged individualism.” If there is a bogus “national religion,” this would be it. Read any history you like, and you will quickly see that what pushed the frontier Westward was “hanging together” with others—wagon trains, expeditionary parties, and the communities they built along the way. (Of course, the violence and injustice they also perpetrated against tribal peoples who already inhabited the land is another matter not to be addressed in this message, but it IS important to realize that in the settlers’ efforts to drive out the indigenous peoples, they had to “break” the Native American communities to do so, separating families, tribes, and eventually the horrendous “Trail of Tears.”) If there is anything that truly CAN be said to be the “secret” to American expansion and survival, it is that phrase, “hanging together.” We all know that world wars—especially World War II—brought people of all walks, religions, and philosophies together to function as one large community, in order to successfully sue for peace against oppressive foes. The striving for civil rights by persons of color in this country would have had a much tougher row to hoe, had leaders and people of the majority race not banded together, supported, and marched with Black leaders. (Unfortunately, too many members of the white majority race have in recent years voted in leaders who seem bent on revoking the hard-won human rights of this movement, so not all “hanging together” is productive, or even moral work.)

 

The fact is that whatever higher pursuits a people choose to engage in, coming together—“hanging together”—is an essential part of the effort. People must focus on the goal at hand, set aside the things that separate them, and work toward that goal. Franklin’s little play on words is actually quite profound. Had the signers of the Declaration of Independence immediately reverted to the differences that spurred so much deliberation in their body before the final declaration was agreed upon and signed, they would have eventually been “picked off” by the powerful British regime. However, by hanging together, they became a powerful ideological force that went on to breed a powerful citizenry bent on independence, and an even more powerful and effective military. Again, the secret to this latter factor in the war of independence was kept together and fought as one force by an historic “catalyst”—General George Washington, a man who famously set aside individual goals in favor of birthing a new nation “conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all [men] are created equal,” a phrase later uttered by another great “catalyst.”

 

It is of great importance to note that this week’s text is Jesus’ great concatenation of the Ten Commandments into two easy to remember: love God; love your neighbor. I suppose that one could argue that these are also “nested” commandments—we demonstrate our love of God BY loving our neighbor as ourselves. Jesus says something remarkable about these two commandments—"On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.” How often do we miss seeing the foundational things that much greater structures “hang” on! The whole of the United States as a nation “hangs” on the words of the Declaration of Independence that created it, and the constitution that became our “operating rules,” and that which guards human freedoms. For Jesus to say that everything his followers had previously believed in could “hang” from these two commandments was truly revolutionary. And we keep forgetting both the simplicity and the profundity of his assertion. Our human tendency is to keep adding rules and defining how and to whom these additional rules apply. This is what weakens any faith system—setting too-restrictive boundaries on what the resulting community should “look like” and how it should function. Eventually, the community is either split or destroyed, when a separate faction that disagrees reaches a plurality level and begins to wreck things or “takes it ball and bat and goes home,” as they say. As the American revolutionaries found out, “hanging together” is hard work. And as we Christians have discovered, “loving God and neighbor” isn’t easy, either. But if you want to build a strong, empathetic, and edifying community, the work must be engaged. Dissent can indeed be a helpful corrective element of a “hanging together” community, but only if it is SEEN as a corrective, and only if the ones raising it have building up the community in mind. Likewise, those who start advancing tighter restrictions on the community might have altruistic aims in mind, but too often they can’t see how this may also choak off the community, if done unchecked. “Majority votes” may be one of the worst things to happen to struggling communities.

 

Dara and I watched an interesting documentary on the Statue of Liberty the other night. Frederic Auguste Bartholdi was the French sculptor who created this inspirational work of art, but it never would have been erected without an internal “strut,” an engineering marvel in itself, designed by Gustave Eiffel, who would later do a little tower building of his own. You don’t see Eiffel’s strut when you gaze upon Lady Liberty, but it is there, hanging everything together against the elements, keeping her strong. Even as it took two geniuses and a host of fabricators and financiers to bring her to life, so it is with the church and any vital human endeavor.

 

The two “simple” commandments Jesus gave us are like Eiffel’s strut. When they work, they are “behind the scenes.” What we see is the outer “work of art”—the loving, supportive, and edifying community they create, in the church, and in the world. Franklin was certainly right: We either hang together, or we will most assuredly hang separately. Jesus’ words are much “softer,” but they mean exactly the same thing. Amen.

Listen to this message...

Send In the Clones!

 

Send in the Clones

 

1 Thessalonians 1:1-10

Thanksgiving for the church at Thessalonica 

 

1:1 Paul, Silvanus, and Timothy, To the church of the Thessalonians in God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ: Grace to you and peace.

 

1:2 We always give thanks to God for all of you and mention you in our prayers, constantly

 

1:3 remembering before our God and Father your work of faith and labor of love and steadfastness of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ.

 

1:4 For we know, brothers and sisters beloved by God, that he has chosen you,

 

1:5 because our message of the gospel came to you not in word only but also in power and in the Holy Spirit and with full conviction; just as you know what kind of persons we proved to be among you for your sake.

 

1:6 And you became imitators of us and of the Lord, for in spite of persecution you received the word with joy inspired from the Holy Spirit,

 

1:7 so that you became an example to all the believers in Macedonia and in Achaia.

 

1:8 For the word of the Lord has sounded forth from you not only in Macedonia and Achaia but in every place your faith in God has become known, so that we have no need to speak about it.

 

1:9 For they report about us what kind of welcome we had among you, and how you turned to God from idols, to serve a living and true God,

 

1:10 and to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead--Jesus, who rescues us from the coming wrath.

 

Who remembers Dolly, the sheep? What was special about her? Yeah, she was the first successfully CLONED mammal. That happened in Scotland, back in 1996, and Dolly lived a relatively normal life, dying in 2003. After Dolly, many other animals have been cloned successfully. Cloning involves using the DNA from a donor cell and putting it into an ovum of the species. The resulting animal is genetically identical to the animal from which this somatic cell is used in the cloning process. As far as anyone knows, no human has been cloned, despite shady “reports” that this has been tried in China. If you want to see a humorous movie scene involving cloning, watch Woody Allen’s “Sleeper.” He and Diane Keaton are dissidents in a future totalitarian society, masquerading as cloning scientists, and they are charged with cloning a dictator from his nose, the only part of him found after he was assassinated by a bomb. They have no idea what they are doing, and while trying to fool the authorities, they lay out a suit of clothes from the late dictator’s wardrobe, place the nose where the face should be, and tell the gathered political operatives that they will attempt to “clone him into his clothes.” 

 

While cloning may never be the most popular way to replicate life, it is part of the latest generation of disease-fighting drugs called “monoclonal antibodies,” which are cloned from a single white blood cell, and produced to attack specific diseases such as types of cancer, in a specific patient. Years ago, in the early days of monoclonal antibodies, I had a young parishioner who was experimentally treated for juvenile-onset rheumatoid arthritis with them, and the results left her to live a mostly normal life, after an early fear of debilitation. 

 

So we know a little about cloning, now, but what does this have to do with our Bible passage this weekend? We’ll get there; be patient.

 

How do we make disciples in the church, today? This is an important question, especially for United Methodist Christians, as we are charged with “making disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world.” First of all, I have to confess that, while I strongly affirmed the “vision” of making disciples of Jesus Christ, for this IS what Jesus told us to do, I have always balked at the phrase added years ago by the bishops, “for the transformation of the world.” While we Christ followers DO believe that becoming a disciple of Jesus Christ may help bring about a new and better world, especially if we live according to the teachings of Jesus, this particular phrase, “for the transformation of the world” sounds crusading, to me. It has the potential for leaning toward exclusivism—might we believe that ONLY disciples of Jesus Christ can participate in bringing about a better world? I sincerely hope not. And what are we “transforming the world” into? A “Christian” world? Things can be “transformed” but not always in a positive way. It is safe to say that Vladimer Lenin “transformed” Russia and Mao Tse-Tung “transformed” China, but not necessarily in ways we are happy about. The designated hitter rule has “transformed” Major League Baseball, but again, not all of us are happy about that, either. You see what I mean? One has to read a lot more verbiage from the United Methodist Church to get a picture of just how we would like to see the world “transformed,” and not all of us see that the same, either. A whole pile of people and churches opted out because THEY didn’t like our view of transformation, and the two resulting factions may be working against each other, thanks to these divergent views. But, back to disciple-making.

 

How DO we make disciples? Some would say through preaching, Christian education, Bible study, etc., which have been the standard Modus Operandi of the Christian church for millennia. While I wouldn’t argue against this formula, it is clear that we are now in an age when more people eschew attending a church (or a church-related class) than DO attend, so these methods aren’t effective unless someone parks it in the pew. Oh, I realize that COVID opened the floodgates to “streaming” our services to the masses, but again, if someone isn’t already acclimated to the “church scene,” they probably aren’t going to sit through your worship service on YouTube or Facebook. Some churches have been effective with iterations of the “The Church has Left the Building” campaigns, enlisting people—including some “unchurched folk”—into acts of Christian mission or charity, and thereby exposing them to the values of discipleship. Even this, though, has had a limited effect, and rather quickly became somewhat trite, as for many in the “target” audience, the whole idea of “church” continues to be a non-starter, whether it is in the building or OUT of it. I’m not saying that the church is out of the picture when it comes to making disciples, but it should see itself as the “training ground” for disciple-makers, and as a “vehicle” for facilitating this process. 

 

Individual witnessing has been, for the longest time, the preferred method of the evangelical community for “bringing people to Christ.” Unfortunately, unlike the original twelve disciples—and most especially Andrew, who was good at literally bringing people TO Jesus—“soul-winning” became a kind of pelt-collecting enterprise. Some “technique,” be it the infamous “Four Spiritual Laws” of Campus Crusade for Christ, or the tasteless, scary theology of the little, cartoon “witnessing” tracts by evangelical author/artist Jack Chick, was used to “break the ice” to talk to a friend, family member, or even a total stranger, “about Jesus.” Questions like “Do you know Christ as your personal Savior?” or “If you were to die tonight, are you sure you would go to heaven?” were the openers, any variation of which reduced a complicated understanding of the “eternal soul” to a punchline. The “goal” was to get the targeted individual to “confess” that they “needed” Jesus, and to say the “sinner’s prayer,” after which their soul was believed to be “saved,” and the witnessing individual could check them off the list of the damned. An effort may or may not be made to “connect” the “saved” individual to any kind of supportive, spiritual community, and often, no conversation about the individual’s religious history was even broached. Now, let me say that there is NOTHING WRONG with witnessing one’s faith in Christ to another person, provided it is done in love of God and this “neighbor,” and not just as a “technique” or as a bragging rite. I always told my congregations that one of the best witnesses (other than just being a loving neighbor and doing kind, caring, “acts of mercy” as Mr. Wesley would call them) a person could do was to offer to pray for a person going through some ordeal, and ask if it would be OK to put them on our church’s prayer list, so that others may pray for them, too. Most all folk will acquiesce to this, and when some positive change happens in their situation, they will “seek you out,” and will often want to hear more about a person and a church that would pray for someone they didn’t even know. I would tell my parishioners that it is much easier to witness to your faith when you are on the other end of such an “interview,” than it is to use some scary line to “cold call” a witness, such as the “Four Spiritual Laws” types might do. “Scary” is an important word here, as often the “cold call” witness uses fear (of sin, death, hell) to “sell” the target on “meeting Jesus.” Faith that begins with such a fear often is lived out in fear, rather than in the “perfect love” that the Bible tells us should “cast out” all fear. It is also unfortunate that so many folk left in our churches today, began their faith journey with such fear, and have been quasi-paralyzed by it, since. If our church “smells” of this kind of fearful language and theology in its effort to “bring people to Jesus,” most modern folk—especially the younger ones—will not apply. 

 

Now, on to the main point of this meandering sermon…in this text from First Thessalonians, the Pauline author introduces one of the major themes in Paul’s teachings. Paul’s idea of “witnessing” or leading people to faith in Jesus Christ is to CLONE them! Read verse 6: “you became imitators of us and of the Lord...” Throughout the teachings of Paul, as reflected in the writings reflecting them, Paul basically tells his audiences, “If you want to know how to follow Jesus, FOLLOW ME,” or “Do what I do.” He often literally says “imitate me,” or “imitate US,” as he does in this passage. You see, Paul had developed his faith into something he was CONFIDENT was truly a “discipling” and genuine faith, and he believed that if a prospective disciple were to “do as I do,” this person would join Paul and other Christians on the path of discipleship. One of the important phrases that comes out of the Alcoholics Anonymous “rooms” is this: “If you don’t have faith, act as if you DO have faith, and faith will be imparted to you,” otherwise known by AA folk as “Fake it until you make it.” DO what is necessary to “look” like a disciple, and you will be formed INTO one. This is precisely what Paul is saying here! He wasn’t concerned with “saving souls,” as he believed that if a person was to join others on the Christian faith journey, they would be embraced by the “exceeding abundant” grace of God (saved) AND would be embraced by other Christians in the community of faith, leading to both healthy nurture and effective Christian mission and service, both of which would “build up” the Body of Christ, and partner with God in unfolding the Kingdom of God on earth. Paul’s idea was so much more “organic” than either the evangelical “button-holing” witness OR the various “systems” the church had manufactured over the centuries to “make disciples.” 

 

I have seen this Holy Spirit-based “cloning” work on multiple levels. I have witnessed church folk inviting non-churched folk on mission projects such as Habitat for Humanity-type building restorations in poor communities, to assembling cleaning buckets for UMCOR, to helping at a food pantry. The invitee gets to do something that makes them “feel good” about themselves, and that witnesses to an “authentic” manifestation of human (and even divine?) compassion. Relationships are formed, and trust is built. Often, at some point, the invited individual begins to ask about the kind of FAITH that leads one to DO these things, not just out of curiosity, but out of a real interest in trying such a faith on for size, personally. By being invited to join in the work, and in seeing genuine Christianity in practice, they “build their own theological bridge” to belief. They have been “cloned” by others, led only by a legitimate love for them, and a desire to expand the circle of caring, support, and service.

 

Here’s a story I heard from a colleague years ago. She was assigned to a rural charge of a couple tiny, struggling churches that were “hand-wringing” over the fact that they were sort of dying off, and that their own “children” were no longer interested in attending worship. This new pastor asked them, “What are you good at doing?” After the typical moments of awkward silence in the wake of a question such as this, one person said, “We make REALLY GREAT funeral dinners, or so we have been told.” The pastor suggested that they might consider offering themselves out to MAKE funeral dinners for other local churches, for when they had funerals. They decided to give that a try, and the small “team” began to get a few funeral gigs. As their efforts were warmly received and appreciated (and unexpectedly had become effective fund-raisers!), they needed more people to help fix and serve the dinners, so they invited their “kids” to help, as well as other friends beyond their small church. These agreed, not only to help with a noble cause, but because they also heard they were having a lot of fun DOING it together. Soon, the funeral dinner team was asked if they might serve the “commitment dinner” for a much larger church that was embarking on a building program, and so they did, but this required even more volunteers. Sunday mornings became a time to “celebrate” the work they were doing for others, AND to plan the upcoming dinners. Sunday mornings had become both FUN and purposeful again, and guess what? The churches grew, and many of their “kids” were back! They cloned themselves through compassionate service and witness. Very “Pauline” of them!

 

John Wesley, the “father” of Methodism, did believe not only in “systems” of spiritual formation and discipleship, but also in Paul’s “do as I do” philosophy, as well. If you were raised in the Methodist/United Methodist tradition, you know about the “Holy Club” at Oxford and the “bands” or “class meetings” that Wesley had his people engaged in. Each group was a “discipling” group wherein participants were accountable to one another as well as to God, for their spiritual development, prayer life, attention to the promptings of the Holy Spirit, and acts of mercy to those in need. Holy Club members gave of themselves financially, even to the point of sacrifice, to fund the work they did for the poor, the destitute, and the incarcerated. This was all part of Wesley’s system. However, his overall goal was to raise up OTHER disciples by having his adherents “live out” the Gospel in such a way that others would “see” Christ alive in them, and in their acts of mercy and grace, and would want to align their own lives with these others; in short, they would want to “clone themselves” to be the good and caring people they saw in Methodists. It certainly worked in John Wesley’s day, and personally, I believe this iteration of Paul’s “If you want to follow Christ, follow me” idea will work again in our time. So many are skeptical of the wide swath of people and philosophies that are labeled “Christian” in our day. In the name of Christ, some are endorsing a form of autocratic government that is squeezing the life out of people, especially the marginalized. In the name of Christ, others are baptizing (or at least looking the other way) as refugees and immigrants are being rounded up, separated from family members, incarcerated in “centers” that sure look like the internment camps utilized against Asians during the Second World War, or are being exiled to countries far from the ones they came from. In the name of Christ, some have so robbed women of their reproductive rights that they are being relegated to second-class citizens, or are made to feel they are the “possessions” of their male counterparts. Still others preach doctrines and dogmas that exclude people whom God loves, or that so tightly defines who is “in” and who is “out” in the Kingdom of God that reasonable people are choosing to stay away from their “brand.” The term “Christian” has become a derogatory term in much of our American society, due to these excesses and abuses. 

 

It is time to hear Paul’s words, and to begin “cloning” again, but this will require those of us who care to “re-enlist” as serious disciples who will sacrifice personal “rights” and privileges in order to become the “somatic cells” necessary for the process. Many years ago, I heard a wise preacher say, “YOU may be the only Bible some people read.” If the Christ we represent by our lifestyle and our priorities is not one true to the Jesus Christ of the Bible, or is so distorted by human-derived rules and practices that scare others away, then we are doing a disservice to God. There’s a famous quote attributed to Ghandi that goes like this: “Be the change that you want to see in the world.” Ghandi didn’t say it, of course; it was actually written by a more modern newspaper columnist, but it does carry some of Ghandi’s philosophy, namely that people will see in us what they will see. If what they see is not what we WANT them to see, then WE must change. Hence, if we DO want people to see our lives as a reflection of Jesus Christ, we must act more like Jesus and live into his teachings, especially those of the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew five and following. 

 

It is important to note that this personal transformation project is meant by Paul to be a JOYOUS one, and not a chore. Paul tells the folks in the church at Thessalonica that even though they are under strong persecution, the “joy of the Lord” and the Holy Spirit will keep their spirits buoyant and celebratory. Following Jesus is a loving, joyful thing, not like “boot camp” or a “war.” After all, who on the outside looking in would want to pattern their lives after a people who are always wailing, weeping, and “gnashing” their teeth? Or who are marked more by their drudgery to “duty” than to celebrating their redemption? 

 

From Paul’s and Wesley’s perspectives, the way the church can AGAIN become relevant in today’s world is to “Send OUT the clones!” It’s time we begin to again “mirror” Jesus more than we mirror the world. Amen.

Listen to this message...

Get These Farm Animals on a LEASH!

Get These Farm Animals on a LEASH!

 

Exodus 32:1-14

The golden calf 

 

32:1 When the people saw that Moses delayed to come down from the mountain, the people gathered around Aaron and said to him, "Come, make gods for us, who shall go before us; as for this Moses, the man who brought us up out of the land of Egypt, we do not know what has become of him."

 

32:2 Aaron said to them, "Take off the gold rings that are on the ears of your wives, your sons, and your daughters and bring them to me."

 

32:3 So all the people took off the gold rings from their ears and brought them to Aaron.

32:4He took these from them, formed them in a mold, and cast an image of a calf, and they said, "These are your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt!"

 

32:5 When Aaron saw this, he built an altar before it, and Aaron made a proclamation and said, "Tomorrow shall be a festival to the LORD."

 

32:6 They rose early the next day and offered burnt offerings and brought sacrifices of well-being, and the people sat down to eat and drink and rose up to revel.

 

32:7 The LORD said to Moses, "Go down at once! Your people, whom you brought up out of the land of Egypt, have acted perversely;

 

32:8 they have been quick to turn aside from the way that I commanded them; they have cast for themselves an image of a calf and have worshiped it and sacrificed to it and said, 'These are your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt!'"

 

32:9 The LORD said to Moses, "I have seen this people, how stiff-necked they are.

 

32:10 Now let me alone so that my wrath may burn hot against them and I may consume them, and of you I will make a great nation."

 

32:11 But Moses implored the LORD his God and said, "O LORD, why does your wrath burn hot against your people, whom you brought out of the land of Egypt with great power and with a mighty hand?

 

32:12 Why should the Egyptians say, 'It was with evil intent that he brought them out to kill them in the mountains and to consume them from the face of the earth'? Turn from your fierce wrath; change your mind and do not bring disaster on your people.

 

32:13 Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, your servants, how you swore to them by your own self, saying to them, 'I will multiply your descendants like the stars of heaven, and all this land that I have promised I will give to your descendants, and they shall inherit it forever.'"

 

32:14 And the LORD changed his mind about the disaster that he planned to bring on his people.

 

In case you’re wondering, today’s sermon title is a paraphrase of a line actor/comedian Jon Lovitz screams out in his character of Ernie Capadino, in the popular film, “A League of Their Own”: “Get these FARM ANIMALS on a LEASH!” The city kid recruiting the first players of an all-girls baseball team for Branch Rickey out in the rural lands of America, almost trips over some free-range chickens, prompting the humorous line. Why do I bring it up here? Well, first of all because I love this film, its humor, and its history. But most of all, because it gives us a clue what Satan might have said to God numerous times throughout human history about US! A leash, indeed. 

 

Are we “farm animals?” Think of how we anthropomorphize most animals, giving them human attributes, naming them with human names, and believing they understand everything we tell them. Kitties, doggies, and even hamsters get treated like children, pampered, overfed, and deeply mourned when they “cross the rainbow bridge.”? I’m guessing that better than half the most-watched YouTube clips and Facebook Reels are about the hijinks of animals, and the humans who love them. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. We DO like to superimpose many of our higher hopes and ambitions upon our animals. Now that I’m living in a more rural town, I’m back to going to county fairs again, and watching the hard transformation that 4-H kids have to experience as they put their beloved cattle and pigs up for auction, knowing that most of them will wind up as a main course. You do have to wonder if God has put God’s own best hopes on US, kind of like we do our pets? Please don’t take this line of thought too far, as it will break down in a hurry, but remember that leash part, too. Maybe there is something to that.

 

Turning to our text for today, which is one of my favorites in the whole Bible, I might add, we hear a word that NONE of us likes to hear, and one that has, from time to time, brought the world a whole load of trouble: DELAY. Moses is delayed, coming down from the mountain and his little tete a tete with God. We do not like delays, of any kind. Road construction causes all manner of unexpected delays, even when we know full well it is happening. Don’t you hate it when some special item you have ordered online is delayed in shipping? A vivid memory I have as a young teen is the time when I sublet a friend’s newspaper route for the Summer, did some painting for my uncle, and picked up a number of other odd jobs to raise enough money to mail order myself a significant camera for my budding photography hobby. After I ordered it, I waited every single day for the UPS truck to bring it to my house, akin to the famous “Wells Fargo Wagon” scene in “The Music Man.” Day after day, I watched for that stupid truck, and disappointment after disappointment when it either didn’t come, or it DID, but with no package for me. Finally, FINALLY, it stopped in front of our house, and the driver handed me my precious package. Upon opening it, I found that the camera’s lens had been broken in shipment, and had to go back. I was so bummed that the wait the second time around seems much shorter, and my high expectations had been rather dampened. Even when the replacement camera arrived undamaged and pristine, I felt more relief than euphoria. Delays can sure rain on our parade, or at least dampen our spirits. In Moses’ case, one almost precipitated an apocalypse.

 

Israel’s response to the tardy Moses was to manufacture their own god, which is rarely a good idea. In this case, they called upon their religious leader—Aaron—to design one for them, using the two things most precious to them, gold and bovine. Hardly any culture in history eschewed the love of gold, and in the case of the Jews under Moses’ care, a cow was most precious. Why? Well, Jews weren’t allowed to fool with pigs at all, and cows gave milk, made for good grilling, and served as sacrifices. So, a cow it was, only in this case a calf, which required less gold to make. The good thing about false gods is that we maintain full control over them, unlike the real one, and if we tire of them, there is always the gold to recover, (or the money from our stocks, or the trade-in value of our Mercades). Many a man, upon hearing that his house was possibly on fire, made sure the wife and kids got out safely, but went back in for the golf clubs. We pooh-pooh Israel when we read this famous story out of Exodus, but believe me, we can make our own gods even better than they did, and unfortunately, we DO have some religious leaders who will help design them for us. (Think “prosperity gospel,” or even that wonderful idol of “biblical authority.” Yes, we like to make the Bible our idol, as this way we can control it, instead of being transformed by it, so many times.)

 

So, Israel makes a farm animal into a god. Who SHOULD have been on a leash, in this story? And why in the world did a man like Aaron go along with this scheme? Was he too timid to “speak the truth” to Israel for fear of being pilloried himself? Was he beginning to believe that Moses might be much more than “delayed” on the mountain, and was tempted to carve out his own niche as Israel’s “supreme leader”? We may never know, but it was not looked upon by Yahweh as a nice thing, and to quote another old movie line, “Death stalked the mountains.”

 

In the midst of their conversation, according to the text, God tips Moses off as to what is going on down in the “barnyard.” God further suggests to Moses that maybe God will just have a little wrath tantrum and start over with Moses’ as breeding stock. Unlike the lily-livered politicians of our day, Moses wasn’t afraid of speaking truth to power, in this case, THE power behind everything! Moses debates God over this starting over plan, and WINS. I don’t know how you understand the verse that says that God “changed God’s mind” over the “disaster” God was thinking about bringing upon Israel, but that’s something! Moses should have some kind of trophy for that little bit of forensics. It was time to get Israel on a leash, not only to get them back in line with the God who loved them and who had truly delivered them, but to keep them from straying yet again. 

 

Let’s look at this text as a kind of parable meant to teach us something, instead of an historical account of what surely must sound a bit preposterous. Israel is clearly an analog for all humans who, when their hopes for safety, security, and wealth are “delayed,” too often take matters into their own hands. Aaron is a metaphor for those who “guide” us when the chips are down, especially religious leaders either trying to sooth the savage beast in us all, OR who decide it’s a great time to stir up the flock in an attempt to “grow the church” or add to its coffers. Just this week, Jim Bakker, the scandalous TV evangelist, passed away at 86. He and his late wife Tammy Fay, started out as puppet-wielding “soul-winners,” but got a glimpse of fame and fortune, and it went to their heads, and their pocketbooks. Aaron was likewise a “good guy,” but it didn’t take much of a “delay” to open a dark door for him to step through, and step he did. I’d hate to think that there are many religious leaders who fall prey to such temptations, but history tells a sadder tale. Let’s imagine Moses as a metaphor for God, in this “parable.” The little “court case” in the story between God and Moses is kind of like the cartoon image of a character being tempted by the little devil on one shoulder and a guardian angel on the other. I’m sure there were MANY times when God vacillated between allowing us to go “free range,” and wanting to put us on a tight leash. Jesus came to offer humanity pardon and reconciliation, once and for all, kind of like Moses “winning” his debate with the Almighty.

 

If the modern Christian church is to redeem ourselves as the “Aaron” in the story, we must find better ways to connect with our audience, and make God’s “leash” a harbinger of safety, security, and guidance, rather than just a tool of control. Dara and I have been attending the Edinboro United Methodist Church since retiring to Meadville, PA. That church is learning how to live out its theme of welcoming “Doubters, Dreamers, and Disciples” into its fold. Any church that can’t welcome the “doubters” will simply not survive this millennium. Without the “dreamers,” we will perish, too, even as we read in the book of Proverbs. And “disciples”? These are the folk who mature in the faith and gladly put on the “yoke” of service, obedience, and mission—indeed, a self-donned “leash.” All healthy, vital churches will be places where the “doubters, dreamers, and disciples” can find acceptance, cast visions, and thrive through doing justice and loving others via service. Going back to our animal metaphor, a leash may either limit an animal’s movement by tethering it to an anchor point, or it may lovingly guide it along as it walks with its “master,” thus keeping it on course and secure.

 

Interestingly, one of the other lectionary texts for this week is the 23^rd Psalm, another human/animal metaphor! We are God’s “sheep,” and God is our “good shepherd.” In this parable, it is the recognized voice and the protecting “rod” of the shepherd that brings prosperity to the sheep. It’s a much more soothing image than the potential pyrotechnics of the Exodus passage, and there is no scavenger hunt for gold involved. If I’m going to be a “farm animal” of any sort in these biblical metaphors, I’ll go with the sheep, as the only leash involved is a close relationship with the shepherd. What we can surely learn from the Exodus account, though, is that our best purely “human” efforts to build the Kingdom of God will not result in either restoring, nor promoting, a better relationship with our Creator. And that story reminds us that Jesus Christ has served as eternity’s “Moses,” forever “winning the debate” over how to deal with a bunch of rebellious “farm animals.” I’ll finish with this paraphrase of John 8:36: “Whom the Son has set free is FREE RANGE!” Amen!

To LISTEN to a recording of this message, click the link below:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kxkYpKUlcYwHb5XWOYzlOcGAkU6fFmDb/view?usp=sharing