The Nature of God Counts for Something

 

The Nature of God Counts for Something

 

1 Samuel 2:1-10

My heart exults 

 

2:1 Hannah prayed and said, "My heart exults in the LORD; my strength is exalted in my God. My mouth derides my enemies because I rejoice in your victory.

 

2:2 There is no Holy One like the LORD, no one besides you; there is no Rock like our God.

 

2:3 Talk no more so very proudly; let not arrogance come from your mouth, for the LORD is a God of knowledge, and by him actions are weighed.

 

2:4 The bows of the mighty are broken, but the feeble gird on strength.

 

2:5 Those who were full have hired themselves out for bread, but those who were hungry are fat with spoil. The barren has borne seven, but she who has many children is forlorn.

 

2:6 The LORD kills and brings to life; he brings down to Sheol and raises up.

 

2:7 The LORD makes poor and makes rich; he brings low; he also exalts.

 

2:8 He raises up the poor from the dust; he lifts the needy from the ash heap to make them sit with princes and inherit a seat of honor. For the pillars of the earth are the Lord's, and on them he has set the world.

 

2:9 He will guard the feet of his faithful ones, but the wicked will perish in darkness, for not by might does one prevail.

 

2:10 The LORD! His adversaries will be shattered; the Most High will thunder in heaven. The LORD will judge the ends of the earth; he will give strength to his king and exalt the power of his anointed."

 

In 1992, I was appointed as an associate pastor to St. Paul’s United Methodist Church in Allison Park, PA. That church was also getting a new lead pastor (or “senior pastor,” as we called them back in the day), the Rev. Dr. Ronald Hoellein. Having served as a solo pastor (what is now called “senior pastor,” interestingly, by the appointment cabinet) for seven years, I knew this would mean an adjustment, on my part. The “good news” was that Ron Hoellein turned out to be the best pastor I have ever personally witnessed, and serving as one of his subordinates (a term HE would never use, by the way) was a great joy. As “associate” pastor, I joined a full-time Director of Christian Education, who was herself finishing seminary and planning for ordination as an Elder, and a retired former district superintendent, who served as our “minister of visitation.” And while my portfolio as associate pastor included a very vital and active youth ministry, Dr. Hoellein rather quickly discovered my administrative skills, and used these gifts to help “reorganize” St. Paul’s considerable “stable” of ministries, which numbered over 121, at that time. And that didn’t count the North Hills Community Outreach Center, which St. Paul’s had been integral in founding in the mid-1980s. It operated out of a building on our campus, and was growing rapidly, eventually eclipsing the operating budget of St. Paul’s! 

 

I offer this background so you can understand how important my five years of working with Ron Hoellein was to forming my ministry, going forward, after my tenure at St. Paul’s ended, at least at that time. I learned much from Ron’s wisdom, but I’m not sure any specific thing was more pronounced than what I learned from his astute and well-honed understanding of human psychology. It was the basis not only of his counseling ministry, but was woven into his interpretation of scripture and his preaching. As one who loved to “teach” the Bible in my own preaching, I came to see how important it was to “make the connection” with my listeners at levels they could truly grasp, especially when it came to feelings, personal needs, and “affectiveness.” And this is where we make the leap to what may be the most important thing I learned from Dr. Hoellein: How do we understand the NATURE of God?

 

I know I’ve brought this topic up numerous times before in these “retirement” sermons, but I guess its importance is so paramount that it just keeps “rearing its head,” as I peruse the lectionary in preparation for writing these weekly sermons. How DO you—YOU—understand the nature of God? Is your view of God that “he” is “the man upstairs”? Or is God the high, holy “judge” who is watching us, and will mete out rewards and punishments based on how we behave? Or, do we believe God IS love? And if so, what does this mean? While we who like to think “theologically” typically rebuff the temptation to “write ourselves on the heavens and then call it God,” it may be redeeming to have a view of a benevolent God who prefers to “rescue the perishing” rather than sink their boat and call it “justice.” How we “see” God may truly define how we act in the PRESENCE of God, and it most certainly may define how we treat OTHERS on this journey.

 

Ron Hoellein always said that our view of the nature of God set the tone for how we related to God, to OTHERS, and even to ourselves. Believing he is correct in this psychological/theological assessment, this brought a whole new perspective into my personal spiritual journey. I took time—still do—to assess this within myself. What IS it I believe about God, and how do I reconcile the scriptures and my own history to it? This concept certainly breathed new life into Outler’s famous “Wesleyan Quadrilateral” for me! Scripture, Tradition, Experience, and Reason are the tools for this personal process of reconciliation, guiding our insights about God, me, and yinz all. It married quite well with Buber’s famous “I-Thou” analysis. 

 

All of this is why this week’s passage from I Samuel chapter 2 tripped my trigger. In this passage, Hannah, the mother of the prophet Samuel,” is giving her famous (and quite prophetic) speech, praising God and setting forth the broad field that will be plowed by her beloved offspring. Her view of the nature of God is profoundly progressive, well ahead of its time, and accurate of the view of God one should receive from a learned and careful view of, you guessed it, Scripture, Tradition, Experience, and Reason! Her speech is perhaps once of the most profound narratives one may find in the Hebrew Bible, and it comes from a woman, which should make some of these testosterone-laden, modern “evangelicals” quake in their cowboy boots. Hannah largely succeeds in laying out a biblical view of the nature of God Almighty. Let’s look at it.

 

Hannah had been upstaged by her husband’s other wife, Peninnah, because she was apparently extremely fertile, while up to this point, Hannah had been barren. Now that Hannah had “miraculously” borne Samuel, she had to tell God what she thought of the Divine, and be thankful for her “deliverance,” to the glory of God. So, part one of her view of God’s nature was that God is a delivering God. She is quite exuberant in her praise of God for offering her God’s favor.

 

God is a God who exalts the humble, lifts the downtrodden, and boosts the poor, while also knocking the “high and mighty” down a few pegs. Human history has clearly shown that when humans are “winning,” we tend to too quickly sing our own praises and give “the big I” praise for all that we have accomplished. Not only do we naturally tend to push God to the side, but we also may use our newly acquired “throne” to cast aspersions on others who now are “less” than we have made ourselves to be. God is the opposite of this, and God tends to not abide humans when they “queue” in this manner. It is truth that one of the saddest realities of human practice is that when an oppressed group finally gets a few rungs up the ladder of deliverance, they “queue” themselves ahead of the next lower oppressed group. As Whites have oppressed Blacks in America, for example, so once Blacks began to make a few gains, they have sometimes turned their ire toward Hispanics. Again, God in Hannah’s speech is a God who doesn’t abide this “queuing” behavior.  

 

The commentators flag the highlighting of “sovereignty of God” issues in Hannah’s speech. Given that I attended a seminary that was organized around the Reformed tradition, God’s sovereignty was foundational to this understanding. The question is: Is there ANYTHING that is not in the purview and “power domain” of the Almighty? The Reformed and typically orthodox answer to this question is a resounding “NO.” As a Wesleyan Christian, I’m guessing John Wesley didn’t spend much time debating or defending God’s sovereignty for one simple reason: If one posits a “God” who created the universe INCLUDING humanity, why even question that such a god is all powerful and master of all domains? If we choose to believe in Yahweh, then we accept this as a given. The Wesleyan question becomes: How then shall we live? And the issue here, at least for Mr. Wesley, was going about the requisite moral/ethical life driven not by “fear” of a vengeful God, but motivated by gratitude for the love and grace extended to the creation by a benevolent God. This “difference” is key to how we perceive the nature of God, isn’t it? If I do something nice for my neighbor out of fear for being punished if I don’t, as opposed to doing it out of love of my neighbor, and out of wanted to glorify God though a benevolent act that “mirrors” God’s own love of me, is this Christian behavior? (I suppose one could argue the point that loving others because God first loved me might be seen as just a variation on the “fear” theme. Is there a higher genuineness in loving others just because they are my neighbors and fellow siblings on the path of life?) Here’s another thought that I personally believe trumps the “sovereignty” question: God created us in God’s “image,” which is a God of love, forgiveness, mercy, and compassion; these are, therefore, the natural “engrams” upon which my being is erected, and it is “natural” to live with them as my personal “core process.” 

 

Scholars point out the “prophetic foreshadowing” in Hannah’s speech. Is it also in our understanding of God’s nature that this “prophetic” manifestation of God’s action among humans is designed to guide our steps, warn us of impending hazards and pitfalls, and keep us both safe and heading toward the “abundant” life Jesus talked of? This view diverges from a more common one of the Hebrew Bible’s prophetic “ministry” being more warning Israel that bad days are coming because they have again screwed up. Hannah’s speech, in my opinion, bolsters the former view of prophecy, and has many have pointed out, seems directly related to the speech we have come to know as the “Magnificat of Mary” in the New Testament. So, God’s “ultimate” nature hasn’t changed between these two prophetic speeches? Who knew? Oh, and it’s important to point out that the two speakers, who seem to so clearly hone in on the actual nature of the divine are WOMEN.

 

All this to say, dear ones, that our view of the nature of God should COUNT FOR SOMETHING! And that “something” has to do with how we understand our relationship TO God, to God’s creation, and to our human siblings, worldwide and next door. But possibly just as importantly, it has to do with how we see ourselves and how we govern ourselves in the affairs of life. Hannah’s speech reminds us that the poor will be exalted, the righteous will reap the benefits of a blessed life, and those who mete out evil will be judged and will likewise “reap” what they have sown. God’s grace is available to all, but the “power” to reject all such benevolences is still granted to the people God has created. Our “free will” gift may be used for good OR for evil, and may even be squandered by us in our most foolish moments. We have within us the seeds of God’s own nature—a God who “wishes that none should perish.” The Incarnation of Jesus Christ is the most perfect reflection of God’s desire to be in a loving relationship with the created. We seem to be doing an adequate job of squandering that, too. On the downside, I would say that the church has more to fear from this, than from the proverbial “gates of Hell.” On the upside, we have been given the power to bring fulfillment to the prophetic speeches of these two great women of the Bible: Hannah and Mary, the mother of Jesus. God’s “nature” certainly counted for something for each of them. Do thou likewise, Beloved. Amen.

Hadad, Medad, and Who Dey?

 

Eldad, Medad, and Who Dey?

 

Numbers 11:24-30

The spirit rests on Israel's leaders 

 

11:24 So Moses went out and told the people the words of the LORD, and he gathered seventy of the elders of the people and placed them all around the tent.

 

11:25 Then the LORD came down in the cloud and spoke to him and took some of the spirit that was on him and put it on the seventy elders, and when the spirit rested upon them, they prophesied. But they did not do so again.

 

11:26 Two men remained in the camp, one named Eldad and the other named Medad, and the spirit rested on them; they were among those registered, but they had not gone out to the tent, so they prophesied in the camp.

 

11:27 And a young man ran and told Moses, "Eldad and Medad are prophesying in the camp."

 

11:28 And Joshua son of Nun, the assistant of Moses, one of his chosen men, said, "My lord Moses, stop them!"

 

11:29 But Moses said to him, "Are you jealous for my sake? Would that all the Lord's people were prophets and that the LORD would put his spirit on them!"

 

11:30 And Moses and the elders of Israel returned to the camp.

 

 

Yeah, we ALL know “Who Dey,” don’t we, Yinzers? “Dey” are the Cincinnati Bengals, one of the division rivals of the favored Towel People. Full disclosure: I happen to like the Bengals, when I’m not rooting for the Steelers against them, for a couple of reasons. First, my son-in-law is a Bengals fan, and I really like my son-in-law. And second, I am a fan of Bengals’ quarterback, Joe Burrow, the closest thing to “Broadway Joe” in the NFL today, in case you haven’t seen his getups he wears enroute to games. (Too bad a man with such fashion class has to play for a city whose bridges look like they came out of an Erector Set.) But for the purpose of today’s sermon, let’s forget about the Bengals, the Steelers, and the skyline horror that is Cincinnati. The text is far more interesting.

 

Yes, sports fans, it is Pentecost Sunday, the ugly stepchild of Christian “holidays.” Christmas and Easter are the “Joe Burrow” of high holy days, while Pentecost is a beer-belied scruff bucket in a MAGA hat. And it shouldn’t be so. The birth of Jesus is truly a magical, fantastic story that grabs at the heart of human babyhood. The Holy Week narratives remind us not only of human frailty and something British author Francis Spufford called HPtFtU, which stands for the “Human Propensity to [foul] things Up.” We killed the Son of God because we “differed” from his rhetoric about what we most needed to do. Easter fixes everything. EVERYTHING, or at least launches that rocket. No wonder we dress up, decorate, and eat ourselves into oblivion over these two Christian celebrations! Then there’s Maude, er, Pentecost. 

 

I suppose the first problem with Pentecost is that we don’t understand much about “God’s Spirit.” We get the baby in the manger and the Savior triumphant over death and the grave. These we can picture. But a “Holy Ghost”? Who is she? (Oh, I’ve gotten in a lot of trouble over the years referring to the Holy Spirit as a “she,” but she really CAN be seen in this light.) The Hebrew and Greek words we translate “Spirit” are feminine, AND, if we are made in the image of God, then God certainly embodies the whole spectrum of gender and gender expression. I have often told my congregations to think of the woman or women who most embodied the love and grace of God in their lives, and then think of this person when imagining the Holy Spirit. It makes a lot more sense than “Holy Ghost,” which conjures up images of either Casper or “The Amityville Horror,” neither of which is particularly “holy” in nature. (I guess there is that wispy apparition of the rehabilitated Anakin Skywalker who shows up in the final frames of the third Star Wars film, but his “deathbed” heroism isn’t the stuff the Spirit’s made of, is it?)

 

The importance of the Holy Spirit to the birth, history, and continuation of the Christian church cannot be overemphasized. In marching band, we used to say, “Without the band, football is just a game.” Without the Holy Spirit, there IS no music, no “game,” nor is there a score for either (like what I did there?). From the Holy Spirit we get the language of invitation and grace, the institution of the Lord’s Supper, and the “after dinner gifts” to send everybody home happy, and with a job to do. Need wisdom? Ask God, and the Holy Spirit will DoorDash it your way. Feeling like you have nothing to contribute to the Unfolding Kingdom of God? Trust the Holy Spirit for your giftedness, and gifted you will be. Not all of us get the dais, but the most essential spiritual gifts work in the backrooms and kitchens of the Kingdom, anyway. The Holy Spirit uses the entire human spectrum from “cradle to grave” to lead people to a relationship with the Divine, and can work through walls, be they physical, spiritual, or mental. And like “Rocky” in “Project Hail Mary,” the Spirit has superhuman hearing, so don’t be afraid to ask for what you need. 

 

I was thrilled to see this Numbers text come up in the lectionary for Pentecost this year, bored as I am with the Acts text and its winds, tongues, and flames. Honestly, they aren’t bad metaphors for the “powerful” stuff of which the Spirit of God is capable, but there seems to be a lot of “Hollywood” going on here. While the pyrotechnics are impressive, most of the work of the Holy Spirit goes on in private, and at the depths of the human heart. I once heard the Holy Spirit described as the “Hound of Heaven,” meaning that the Spirit just keeps touching the heart, sometimes bringing a wayward soul to a moment of conviction wherein they finally say “YES” to God’s great “YES” to the world, Jesus Christ. Jesus, through the agency of the Holy Spirit, can uniquely mend the broken heart and make a person whole AND holy, when before they were just “full of holes.” I was a box-seat witness to the miracle the Holy Spirit did at St. Paul’s United Methodist Church to guide it through the COVID pandemic. Not only did the Spirit give wisdom to the St. Paul’s leadership team to get us through, but she brought the best gifts of our weekday ministry directors and staff to the fore, keeping our important childcare, preschool, and afterschool programs operating, sparing innumerable families even more COVID hardship. This is what brings us to Eldad and Medad—the miraculous, essential, and sometimes “pesky” work of the Holy Spirit.

 

In the Numbers text, these two fellows stayed in the Israeli camp, after the 70 elders Moses had appointed had stopped prophesying. Eldad and Medad felt the call of the Spirit of God to prophesy, but they did so all around the camp, so the “common folk” could hear the Word of the Lord. They were not part of the “in-crowd,” or the “chosen elite,” but just two guys whom the Spirit touched and sent to give a good word. A young man tattled on them to Joshua, who petitioned Moses to make them stop. This story has a parallel in the New Testament, when Jesus’ disciples—who were obviously part of the “chosen,” at least in their minds—tattled to Jesus that they had heard of a guy casting out demons and “doing good” in the name of Jesus, but he was not part of their group. They admonished Jesus to stop the man, much like Joshua wants Moses to do to Eldad and Medad. Jesus gave a timeless response: “The one who is not against us is for us.” Leave them alone, for the Spirit of God is afoot.

 

There are two important lessons here: The Holy Spirit will do what the Holy Spirit will do, and is no “respecter” of persons, meaning the Holy Spirit may choose to work with and through anybody who is a willing vessel. There is a randomness, at least seemingly, to the Spirit’s “methodology,” and often a kind of playfulness as well. Maybe this is another reason she gets that “Hound of Heaven” moniker? The second lesson is that we are not the gatekeepers on the work of the Holy Spirit. I’m not saying that we Christian leaders shouldn’t be on the lookout trouble stirred up by errant doctrinal teachings or persons being sucked in to harmful religious practices by bad or self-serving theology. What I AM saying is that we should be tolerant of faith expressions we may not either understand or feel completely comfortable with, ourselves. While I struggle with more “fundamental” or “evangelical” Christian philosophies and practices, I acknowledge that the Holy Spirit CAN and DOES work through these manifestations of our faith to lead some into a relationship with Jesus. I don’t abide the judgmental attitude I often see in these groups, but if persons are finding faith through them, I should acknowledge this and be thankful. I can also pray that these “new” Christians find growth through the Holy Spirit that may lead them to a more inclusive, mature understanding of what Jesus was trying to build in the Kingdom of God.

 

While we in the United Methodist Church do not frequently practice the “sign gifts” of the Holy Spirit such as prophecy or speaking in tongues, we do believe the Holy Spirit may still use them for good in the Body of Christ. The Pentecostal and Charismatic churches do manifest these gifts, and many have come to faith through these expressions, too. We Christian believers are admonished several times in scripture to “not attribute the work of the Holy Spirit to the devil,” meaning that, while WE may not cotton to these “showier” or outwardly demonstrative spiritual gifts, we should not declare them either “wrong” or null and void in our time, as some have. Doing so may rob the Holy Spirit of valuable avenues to lead the broader realm of humanity to faith in God. I often said in my sermons that my theology and mode of ministry might reach persons that the Black church or the Pentecostal church down the street could not reach, and vice versa. We are all part of the Body of Christ, after all. Besides, Hadad and Medad are here to remind us that the Holy Spirit may choose to use someone we have never even heard of to touch persons with the love and redemption of God! Who Dey? Dey be channels of the Spirit!

 

Moses’ response to this “outrage” of Hadad and Medad’s peripatetic prophesying ministry is also a lesson for us: Would that all the Lord's people were prophets and that the LORD would put his spirit on them! Moses gets it! Good leaders don’t look to RESTRICT, they recognize the wisdom of turning the Spirit loose, and encouraging “those who are not against us.” Moses did. Jesus did. And those are the Bible’s two most influential figures! May we persons of faith “borrow” the Cincinnati Bengal’s rallying cry, in this regard: “WHO Dey? WE Dey!” Amen.

The Devil You Say

 

The Devil You Say

 

1 Peter 4:12-14; 5:6-11

God sustains those who suffer 

 

4:12 Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery ordeal that is taking place among you to test you, as though something strange were happening to you.

 

4:13 But rejoice insofar as you are sharing Christ's sufferings, so that you may also be glad and shout for joy when his glory is revealed.

 

4:14 If you are reviled for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the spirit of glory, which is the Spirit of God, is resting on you.

 

5:6 Humble yourselves, therefore, under the mighty hand of God, so that he may exalt you in due time.

 

5:7 Cast all your anxiety on him, because he cares for you.

 

5:8 Discipline yourselves, keep alert. Like a roaring lion your adversary the devil prowls around, looking for someone to devour.

 

5:9 Resist him, steadfast in your faith, for you know that your brothers and sisters in all the world are undergoing the same kinds of suffering.

 

5:10 And after you have suffered for a little while, the God of all grace, who has called you to his eternal glory in Christ, will himself restore, support, strengthen, and establish you.

 

5:11 To him be the power forever and ever. Amen.

 

Many moons ago, a Black comedian—Flip Wilson—crafted a character who used to say, “The DEVIL made me do it!” He always got a laugh out of it, but as the years went by, we began to see people doing horrible things—even killing throngs of people in nightclubs, outdoor concert venues, schools, and even a synagogue here in Pittsburgh, because “the devil” put such a deep hatred in their hearts that ideas and bigotry mattered more than human lives. Someone has said, “The devil is in the details.” Perhaps the devil IS the details, for it is in the details that so many have lost their souls and came to believe that only THEIR “details” are the right details, or the most “spiritually correct” ones. When people act out of such strong, often deluded confidence, “devilish” things can happen, and they are usually swallowed up in them, themselves, before the debacle is all over. This is how the “devil” works. It’s important to note how this general epistle describes “the devil” as prowling like a “roaring lion.” Lions prowling as they hunt for food is perfectly normal thing; it’s nature working as nature does. What has been labeled as “the devil” works through perfectly “normal” human processes, but evil happens when they become distorted by overzealousness, misplaced passion, or are enacted “out of proper context,” kind of like letting a lion loose from a zoo, or removing it from its natural environment and dropping it off in a child’s playground. Metaphorically, this is what happens when persons’ ideas grow distorted and they act upon them. Is “the devil” for real?

 

Most of the first-century Christ followers had been Jews. The Jewish people were—and are—strict monotheists, believing in only ONE God. The famous Shema is: “Here O Israel: The LORD is our God, the LORD is One.” While this is why these early Jewish Christ followers had trouble grasping the “divinity” of Jesus Christ, it is also why they didn’t accept the idea that “satan” or “the devil” was in any way a god-like being, with any of the power or traits of the Eternal. (The early Gentile Christ followers were a different matter. Many of them had come from pagan traditions where they had gods for everything, so one that was a “dark-sider” would not have been unusual, in their thinking.) While the Jewish people had little to do with a “devil,” and tended to either place evil in the purview of GOD (yes, just read your Old Testament; such strict monotheists HAD to believe that their ONE God was somehow even responsible for evil events), OR in the hearts of human beings. Note that we’re not talking about random “bad events” that can happen to any of us. The Jews did NOT believe that EVERY happening had to be either caused by or “permitted” by Yahweh. Bad things can happen to good people in life, and most of the time, “evil,” either personified in a “devil” or personalized in the evil acts of an individual or a government, are not “of God.” 

 

The Christian church did extract belief in a “satan” figure, based on some of the accounts they read in scripture. Most especially, we have the “temptation of Christ” stories in the Gospels, where Jesus is put to the test by “the devil.” But again, these are just the passed-down accounts from the authors of the text, as they were NOT eyewitnesses to these events, so they could be more “theological excurses” than historical accounts of what molded and formed Jesus before he began his earthly ministry. Modern fundamentalists and certain Pentecostals have formulated very definite “doctrines” around a satanic persona—the “roaring lion” of I Peter—and even specific procedures of how to deal with “him” or to hold power over “him.” I may be starting to sound like I deny the existence of such a being, and in a way, I am, but I have my reasons, which I’ll address now.

 

First of all, “blaming” some external “perpetrator of evil” like a “satan” figure is so often used as a scapegoat to excuse evil human behavior. We humans have proven time and time again that we are quite capable of such incredible evil, from pogroms, to World Wars, to genocide, to mass shootings. These things are far worse than anything that should be attributed to some “devil,” and they are of our own doing—no “devil” needed. Furthermore, it seems each generation births its own horrors of human evil, the latest in our time being excessive, excused bigotry against persons of color, other ethnicity, or members of the LGBTQ community, as well as the near continuous “rash” of murder-suicides we see almost daily in our nation, a nation that has made an idol out of the gun, which makes such horrors so possible. Again, no “devil” needed. It would be so easy and convenient to have someone like “satan” to blame these things on, but honestly, we must take the responsibility for these devastating events. That we are capable of such things, as well as having the chutzpah to RATIONALIZE them, in many cases, should school us on the lack of need for a devil. How simple it would be to believe we could just perform some kind of “exorcism” to end such suffering! “Be GONE, Satan, in the name of JESUS!”, and everything would return to the steady state.

 

If there IS a “devil” in the world, a better name for him would be “Deceiver.” The power to deceive is an awesome and terrible thing. We are living in a time when our own national government is using deception and outright lies as a “super power” to grab and maintain a tremendous amount of power. Some of the poorist and most oppressed people have been convinced that supporting acts that increase their own suffering and disenfranchisement is what’s best. Folk who work hard to care for themselves and their families are being convinced that losing their healthcare and paying higher prices is “in the national interest” and “for their own good.” And this deception is so effective that many of these same people are wearing the symbols of their oppressors on their heads, tattooing it on their appendages, and erecting signs and banners of tribute in their front yards. That we have national leaders who perpetrate such deceptions and use them to maintain “legitimacy” may sound REALLY evil, but honestly, from a political standpoint, it’s just what “roaring lions” do, in this arena. It’s quite natural for them. That their modus operandi is so blatant and so uncontested (or so it seems), is a sign that more than “human” evil may be at work here. If there IS a devil, he is certainly in the details of this dastardly drama.

 

The writer of this text in I Peter warns believers to “resist” this devil, and by “this” devil, I mean any who would use their power to deceive to further their own agenda and feather their own nest. Down through history, countless purveyors of this “art” have effectively done this, and they have been so good at it that the “victims” they fleeced basically shouted, “Thank you, Sir, may I have another!” They, too, have engaged in petting the lion who is devouring them, even in the act of doing so. What do you think this author of scripture was warning against? In his time, it was Rome, which, under the guise of the “Pax Romana,” was enslaving and controlling the “common folk” in order to fund and preserve the “peace” of the illuminati. Is today any different? That “roaring lion” is just so beautiful, isn’t he?

 

All right, where is the GOOD NEWS here? In the big picture, it is that Jesus Christ himself flew right into the maw of the “roaring lion,” and while he endured the cross, he triumphed over the ultimate “threat” of “the devil”: death! Resurrection is the Christian belief that this “final word” on who’s in charge is NOT the final word, and its finite condemnation has no power over the grace of the Eternal, who came to rescue us, and to judge the perpetrators of this “devil/evil.” 

 

The “final word” of this Good News is that the “God of all grace” has visited us in Jesus Christ to “restore, support, strengthen, and establish” us! The collective term used in ecclesiology is “edify” the Body of Christ. Jesus Christ IS the final authority on this wonderful ministry of reconciliation, renewal, and resilience of God’s people. Those who cling to their manipulation, deception, and victimizing of the innocent (in some cases, the ignorant) will be judged by a “higher power.” Those who have been marginalized and oppressed will continue to be set free by “the God of all grace.” The “devil,” be he real, imagined, or incarnated in the selfish desires of powerful people, will be dispatched with a word, even as he was by Jesus in the temptation stories.

 

Friends, this is not just an eschatological promise—it’s for right now, for all to invoke! “Resist the devil and he will flee from you” is something that all Christ-followers have the power to do. Just don’t be surprised that when you invoke it, who leaves! There is evil masquerading as your economic, political, and even “moral” saviors, and in their hearts, they mean you no good. Resist them, for our world and our church will not recover until we do. Amen.

Entanglement

Entanglement

 

Acts 17:22-31

Paul's message to the Athenians 

 

17:22 Then Paul stood in front of the Areopagus and said, "Athenians, I see how extremely spiritual you are in every way.

 

17:23 For as I went through the city and looked carefully at the objects of your worship, I found among them an altar with the inscription, 'To an unknown god.' What therefore you worship as unknown, this I proclaim to you.

 

17:24 The God who made the world and everything in it, is Lord of heaven and earth, and does not live in shrines made by human hands,

 

17:25 nor is God served by human hands, as though God needed anything, since God himself gives to all mortals life and breath and all things.

 

17:26 From one ancestor he made all people to inhabit the whole earth, and God allotted the times of their existence and the boundaries of the places where they would live,

 

17:27 so that they would search for God and perhaps fumble about for God and find God--though indeed God is not far from each one of us.

 

17:28 For 'In God we live and move and have our being'; as even some of your own poets have said, 'For we, too, are God’s offspring.'

 

17:29 "Since we are God's offspring, we ought not to think that the deity is like gold or silver or stone, an image formed by the art and imagination of mortals.

 

17:30 While God has overlooked the times of human ignorance, now God commands all people everywhere to repent,

 

17:31 because God has fixed a day on which the world will be judged in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed, and of this God has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead."

 

 

What if I told you that science has proved the bizarre theory that two subatomic particles—photons—can be given a like charge, and then split apart as far as the East is from the West, and because of something called “quantum entanglement,” if the nearest one has its charge reversed, the other particle, with which it is entangled, will instantaneously change its charge to match? And this “entanglement” phenomenon seemingly happens at much faster than the speed of light, which the General Theory of Relativity (Einstein’s work of genius) says is impossible. Now, there are lots of “explanatory” theories as to how this may happen, the most unusual of these having to do with how the very act of observing the particles itself changes them. But how can one particle know what is happening to the other, especially if it has been sent halfway across the galaxy? This is the “magic” of quantum entanglement. I say “magic” because it is, actually. The stuff of quantum theory that has already been proven, much of it in the laboratory, has left little room for questioning its validity. The quantum understanding of the nature of existence is so “real” that we have already tapped its “magic” to build the earliest of quantum computers. I read recently that one of these “primitive” quantum computers, when fed mathematical “chum” (complex problems set up by a “regular” computer of current technology), was able to perform calculations that would have taken the current “fastest” computers over 10,000 YEARS to do, and it did them in a matter of seconds. You see, a quantum computer is not limited to the “off” and “on” binary states of current digital computers, but has all of the various quantum states as operators. Unbelievable.

 

No, I’m not going to tell you more about quantum entanglement and quantum mechanics, because most of what you have just read is all I know, and this is after years to reading about it and trying to understand it. And, believe me, most of what you have just read will be disputed, corrected, and even totally debunked by the latest of quantum theorists. I’ve already read, for example, that the “Bell’s theorem” about the entangled photons may be true because the two “particles” (and yes, there are serious questions in quantum mechanics as to whether “particles” actually exist) may not be “apart,” even when we think we have moved them thusly. Their relationship to each other, according to this wrinkle, cannot be altered, even when we think we’ve done so. Think this is weird? How about the little particle we have dubbed a QUARK? Quantum theorists tell us there are six “flavors” of Quarks they have named: up, down, top, bottom, strange, and charm. These are the kinds of strangeness the just-emerging quantum computer can tap to do its magic! You think we have a problem with computers now, just imagine when they are millions of times faster, come in “flavors,” and are so “related” to each other through entanglement that we can’t turn them off. Where can we go to make any sense out of this stuff? How about the Bible…

 

Yes, the Bible. Some in the community of faith believe the Holy Spirit “inspired” the writers of the Bible to get it perfect, which is how we must interpret it and believe it. Not me. My belief in the Holy Spirit “inspiration” of the Bible comes from its postulates that sound a lot like modern Quantum physics, yet written thousands of years ago, and no, aliens weren’t involved. You know that little, modern praise ditty we sing, “Our God is an awesome God”? I like to redact it to “Our God is a Quantum God,” which is actually more awesome than the original songwriter could have imagined. 

 

If we believe God exists, and has been around for a long while, at least long enough to have been the Creator of all we are and see, then we would necessarily have to believe that God is also the author of all of this Quantum weirdness out of which we somehow exist. If I were to put my life experiences up against the Quark’s, I think I can match it, for my life has seen up, down, top, bottom, strange and charm, many times and manifest in many ways. And after 49 years dedicated to the same partner, I can say that we are close to mastering entanglement, and yet this relationship definitely has had its “strange” and “charmed” moments. Just this morning, in fact. 

 

If there is a biblical author with even a primitive scientific context to his work, it is Dr. Luke, the author of this weekend’s text. Of course, he’s reporting on what the Apostle Paul allegedly said to the gathered braintrust of the Areopagus, the Athenians who liked to parse the meaning of life. And we should not forget that Paul was highly schooled, himself a student of the great Gamaliel, so he was no piker when it came to throwing out some astute postulates to rattle his intellectual audience. Paul starts with their statue to an “Unknown God,” a kind of catchall deity they crafted as a contingency for those things not covered by the myriad other gods festooning the Areopagus. Nothing like a little educated “CYA,” as they say. However, Paul takes the “Unknown God” to extremes, suggesting this God doesn’t just exist to pick up the loose ends, but is instead the CREATOR of it all. It certainly got their attention. He tells them this God can stand alone quite well, thank you, and has no need of anything, particularly from US, whom this God actually created in the first place. This REALLY got their attention, for I’m pretty sure the Areopagus gang felt that by standing around philosophizing, they were “doing God’s work,” and were invaluable to the continuance of reality. I have to ask myself, how far have we progressed from this idea? 

 

I do happen to believe that we humans are called into a “partnership” with God to the ministry of “tikkun olam,” as our Jewish siblings would say. It means “fixing the world.” But it is God who calls us into this service, and not because God “needs” us, but because we need to take some ownership in the task. If God in genie-like fashion just fixed it for us, we would promptly “subdue” it again, if not in the name of profit, then at least power. But God doesn’t “need” us, any more than a modern parent “needs” children. (There was a time in earlier agrarian America when a fleet of children were necessary to help the subsistence farming efforts of the family, but we are long past that.) We tend to have children today for a variety of reasons, the best of which is we want a family to love, and to build into a supportive, growing, and interdependent “community.” And if we do it correctly and ethically, we might just turn our children out into the world as responsible adult citizens who will continue to engage in tikkun olamin their generation, for let’s face it, there is a lot more “fixing” to do than we can get done in our time. 

 

This “partnership” God is calling us into is not furthered by our doing the “Athenian coffee hour” kind of thing, standing around “doing theology” and making up religious rules to make disinterested others do what we believe they should be doing. We are in an era when a lot of this is going around. In our own faith of Christianity, we have more than enough “thinkers” who preach a brand of Christianity that “clearly” lays out the correct doctrines and dogmas, pontificates on the “appropriate” interpretations of scripture, and tacks the label “biblical authority” on its own version of the catchall “Unknown God.” The kind of partnership God is calling us may well be helped, not hindered, by alliances with humanists and believers of other religions who share the goal of fixing the world, not proselytizing it. 

 

In a book I’m reading right now, Unapologetic: Why despite everything, Christianity can still make surprising emotional sense, by Francis Spufford, he makes a case for expanding the partnership. He quotes Irish novelist and playwright, Samuel Beckett, as defining his own atheism in a single statement, “God doesn’t exist, the bastard!” Beckett, like so many other atheists, would like to believe there IS a deity who desires all humans to live together in peace and harmony, but he just doesn’t see it, and he’s sad about that. (I found Beckett’s statement both haunting and insightful, and am still pondering it.) And while I DO believe God exists, I am tempted to echo Woody Allen’s thought that God may well be an “underachiever.” But perhaps it’s WE who are the underachievers?

 

And this brings me to my final point: entanglement. Paul, at least in Dr. Luke’s testimony here, says something quite insightful that would have grabbed the Areopagus crowd right in the groin, regarding their “Unknown God”: In God we live and move and have our being, a statement Paul attributes to one of their own poets. Talk about entanglement! Couple that with what Paul tells the Colossians, that “God is all and in all, and that which holds all things together,” and you pretty much have a decent first-century description of what the Quantum scientists are telling us. We, the creation, AND the Creator are forever entangled, and even as the quantum computer people are just scratching the earliest surface of what a quantum computer will look like, so we, as humans may just be about to embark on a cursory understanding of what this entanglement with each other, God, and the universe may look like. At the very least, it pretty much kills off the “Lone Ranger” version of religious narrative. I happen to believe that this “entangled” God DOES exist, and until we “get it” about just how entangled we all are under the sun, then WE are the bastards—the ones needing reconciliation to the model. 

 

Speaking about “under the sun,” there is the Son to be dealt with. God has “so entangled the world that God sent the only Son into the world that none should perish.” Heard something like that before? God is SO entangled with us that God Almighty sent Jesus into the human world as PART of the human world, and as soon as he was able to speak, he began connecting us to the “quantum” scriptures of the Torah and teaching us about how to live as people forever “entangled” with God and our neighbor. 

 

This text ends up talking about judgment. Why do we always connect biblical talk of “judgment” with punishment? (And yes, I know there are texts that do that, but what if this “judgment” is just an entangled God’s way of saying we would be periodically “graded” to help improve our efforts at partnering with all this fixing, redeeming, and reconciling stuff? Even Paul in this text seems to equate this judgment with the hope of the resurrection, leading me to believe that this is precisely what God wants to do, when the word “judgment” is thrown around. An “entangled” God wouldn’t “judge and punish,” but would instead “grade and correct,” for to quote the immortal Steve Smith (“Red Green”), “We are all in this together.” Maybe all those quarks, mu mesons, photons, and Higgs bosons are just following our lead? After all, Jesus DID try to teach us how to cope with all of life’s up, down, top, bottom, strange, and charm moments of life! Amaze, amaze, amaze! Amen.

 

Waze

 

Waze

 

John 14:1-6

Christ the way, truth, life 

 

14:1 "Do not let your hearts be troubled. Believe in God; believe also in me.

 

14:2 In my Father's house there are many dwelling places. If it were not so, would I have told you that I go to prepare a place for you?

 

14:3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and will take you to myself, so that where I am, there you may be also.

 

14:4 And you know the way to the place where I am going."

 

14:5 Thomas said to him, "Lord, we do not know where you are going. How can we know the way?"

 

14:6 Jesus said to him, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”

 

There are a lot of electronic “gizzies” and modern innovations in the automobile these days, and I am fortunate to own a “state of the art” model. It is a fully electric car with more screens, lights, computers, and “thinking” control systems than even Captain James T. Kirk could have imagined. I heats and cools us passengers using a “heat pump,” something fairly recent on the technological horizon. The car pumps over 250 horsepower almost instantaneously through its front-wheel drive, directly from its powerful permanent magnet electric motor. It goes off like a rocket. Its two large display screens feed me more data than I can possibly use, regarding what the car is up to, and my model even has a projected, “heads-up” display, like a third-generation fighter jet. I don’t have to take my eyes off the road to take in all of the information it can feed directly to the windshield in front of me. And it’s a good thing I keep my eyes peeled on what’s ahead, because a camera is watching me, and should I let them wander away for more than about five seconds, the car vibrates my driver’s seat, and even nudges the steering wheel to center the car, if I let it drift. And there’s more. This car has something called “Super Cruise.” When traveling on one of the almost a million miles of satellite-mapped roadways, I can engage it, and the car takes over the driving. I take my hands off the wheel, and it just drives! On four-lane roads like Interstates and turnpikes, it will even detect a slower vehicle ahead, check all of its 360 degrees of camera to see if the coast is clear, will signal into the passing late, and will pass the other car, signaling and returning to the main lane of travel afterwards. As someone has said, “Amaze, amaze, amaze!” Oh, and while doing all of this passing stuff, it vibrates my seat on the left cheek to warn me it is moving into the passing lane, and then on the right cheek, when it returns to the right lane. If its internal camera sees me doing more than a few seconds of looking away, however, it vibrates the whole driver’s seat, flashes a few attention-getting lights on the steering wheel, and “kicks out,” telling me to take the wheel because I’ve been a bad boy. So no, Super Cruise does not let me check my email or surf social media, but it does allow me to relax and “leave the driving to us,” as the old Greyhound commercial used to say. We travel enough on Interstates that I am quite pleased my “gadget-mobile” has this feature! Between the extreme quiet of an electric car, a comfortable interior including a soothing sound system, and driver and passenger seats that warm your buns in the Winter and chill your cheeks in the Summer, these innovations make the journey a joy.

 

And the journey is the ticket, isn’t it? It is my conviction that our spiritual life in Christ is not only a grace-filled and Spirit-empowered one, but is built on a “journey” theology, as taught by Jesus and shown to us personally by Jesus. We know from reading the Gospels that Jesus’ life and ministry was a peripatetic one, moving from one town and region to another to encounter God’s children, offering healing, salvation, and peace. He even rode on state-of-the-art modes of transportation of his day—boats and a donkey! And on a few occasions, the scriptures use language that sure makes it sound like he pops in and out of threatening venues as only the Son of God can (there’s that “Star Trek” vibe again…) When Jesus is risen from the dead, the angel at the tomb tells the women to let the men know that the risen Jesus “has gone on ahead to Galilee,” and that they can find him there. Even after such a momentous event, Jesus hits the road again. The New Testament, from the Gospels through Revelation, is filled with journeys, journey language, and journey theology. The disciples, history tells us, scattered and took the Gospel message with them wherever they went. Some traditions have Thomas in India and Mary, the mother of Jesus, going as far as Spain. We know that Paul was a traveler. Why, his first encounter with Jesus of Nazareth was on the road to Damascus. The early church and its principal leaders were a “portable” bunch, not confining themselves to any one location. Of course they were following Jesus’ command to “go into all the world and make disciples,” but I think there’s more to it than that. They were also sent to “encounter” new people, to build and encourage community among believers wherever they journeyed, and to keep the work of the Holy Spirit “portable,” too. I think God knew that if the church too quickly became an “institution,” it would bog down and lose its direction, the “vision” of where it was going. 

 

While Dara and I are approaching our 49^th year together, and have loved to take car trips all along the way, “navigating” and keeping on course has often been a sore spot of said journeys. Dara loves maps, and is our map reader, but as we all know, maps can be outdated, confusing—especially when there is new construction—and not able to warn of hazards on the road ahead. Being an incurable gadget freak, for Christmas many years ago, my loving family bought me one of the very first GPS car navigation units called a “Tom Tom.” Suddenly, we could set this thing on the dashboard, dial in our destination, and it would speak the directions and give us a little three-inch digital representation of the road ahead. Amaze, amaze, amaze! Eventually though, a few cars later, this “navigation” became built right into the car, and with a larger screen. Now, it could tell us where gas stations and rest stops were! The journey became easier and so much more fun, especially for a technology geek like me. Initially, this “tech” was a downer for my co-pilot, who to this day keeps her stash of state road maps up to date, thanks to the AAA, but rarely do we use them to plot our course. 

 

In this weekend’s text from John 14, verse six has become rather a famous “memory verse,” especially in the evangelical community: Jesus said, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” This is a very important verse, but not for the reason many think it is. There are those who point to John. 14:6 as “proof” that Jesus is saying that he is the “exclusive” way to the Father, which they take to mean that he negates all other religions and theological perspectives on salvation. Jews? Muslims? Unitarians? Sorry guys, you’re out in the cold unless you “confess Jesus.” I don’t think this is what is being said in this verse at all! Look at it again. The language is JOURNEY language! Jesus is “the way,”  meaning he will give directions and lead the journey. Jesus is “the truth,” which is not objective here, but an on-going “truth-finding and learning” journey which will be guided by Jesus. And Jesus is “the life.” It is this last phrase that gives us the larger meaning of the whole clause—Jesus, the peripatetic Jesus, the “going on before you to Galilee” Jesus—will lead us in the way and the truth, all along the journey of our lives. Not only is this not “exclusive” to the Christian, but promises that for each of us, Jesus will be our guide, and he will invite ALL PERSONS to journey along, regardless of cultural beliefs, religious expressions, or even if one currently has ANY faith at all. This is a verse about God’s desire that “none should perish,” and that all of life is a journey wherein these truths shall be revealed to us along the way. Never was it intended to be a “litmus test” for who is “in” and who is “out.” And look at the objective—“the Father.” We’re not talking about heaven here, friends, we’re talking about seeking knowledge of God the Creator, and our relationship TO God, and it will be opened to us as we journey along with Jesus, and with others. 

 

Have you ever heard of the Camino de Santiago (literally “Way of St. James”)? To quote Google, it is a “network of ancient pilgrim routes across Europe, mainly Northern Spain, culminating at the Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela. It was established WAY back in the 9^th Century. Each year, hundreds of people take this “Camino” hiking journey that takes between four and five weeks to experience spiritual enlightenment and grow closer to God through the experiences of the others who have gone on the journey before. I have personally known a number of folk who have taken this “Camino,” and believe me, it was transformational for them. [Incidentally, there is a wonderful movie about an American going on a Camino called, interestingly, “The Way,” and it stars Martin Sheen. I HIGHLY recommend it!] What is so powerful about the Camino is that it LIVES OUT the Journey theology of Jesus, himself! However, you don’t have to go to Spain and walk the 100k of the Camino de Santiago to start living your Christian life as a peripatetic journey, as opposed to a collection of biblical/theological/doctrinal rules or precepts that “must be obeyed.” Jesus is the journey guy, not the judging rule-maker, and like the Camino walkers, he is engaged in a timeless, worldwide journey to make sure that God’s desire that “none should perish” becomes a reality. The journey invites ALL to join in, with the necessary enlightenment and “commitment” coming in stages, as we walk along together! THIS is what John 14:6 is trying to tell us, Dear Ones.

 

One of the latest new “add-ons” to my car’s fancy navigation system is something called “WAZE.” Waze lets us know if there is a hazard ahead, including something in the roadway, construction, slowed traffic, and accident, or even a policeman monitoring along the road. Waze even suggests alternate routes, if the hazard or inconvenience is bad enough to really hold us up. If we stay on the route, and come upon the issue in question, it asks us if “it is still there,” to which we can answer, and it then can keep its warning to those on the journey after us, current and helpful. What a wonderful metaphor for how Jesus, through the “WAZE” of the Holy Spirit, guides our journey, getting us around the rough spots, keeping us on course, and using our experience and feedback of same to help those yet to come! How wonderful! All I can say is, AMAZE, AMAZE, AMAZE, WAZE! And to you, an AMEN!

 

 

Temple Tuesday

Temple Tuesday

 

Acts 2:42-47

The believers' common life 

 

2:42 They devoted themselves to the apostles' teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers.

 

2:43 Awe came upon everyone because many wonders and signs were being done through the apostles.

 

2:44 All who believed were together and had all things in common;

 

2:45 they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need.

 

2:46 Day by day, as they spent much time together in the temple, they broke bread at home and ate their food with glad and generous hearts,

 

2:47 praising God and having the goodwill of all the people. And day by day the Lord added to their number those who were being saved.

 

One of the recent trends in my perusing the weekly Common Lectionary texts for ideas to write a sermon about is that often a single word jumps out at me. I wonder why that particular word was chosen by the text writer, or the translator, which sends me on a bit of a word study. Often, though, it is not the word choice that grabs me, as much as the questions it raises. This week’s message is one of the latter circumstances.

 

Now, this particular text in Acts has always raised questions, especially among Western Christians who relish their bourgeoisie status in “free” capitalist states like the United States. As a pastor, I was often asked, somewhat incredulously, “Did they really support Communism in the early church?” Short answer: No. The earliest Christians were first and foremost, mostly Jewish “commonfolk,” who were either fascinated by Jesus and began following him, or who had been the recipient of one of his many acts of healing and/or mercy, and out of gratitude, signed on. The next largest group of early Christians were former pagans, or those who practiced the Greco-Roman faiths that had a god for everything. As we have covered before, some of these pagan groups engaged in bizarre “worship” practices that could include wild orgies and sexual practice, most of which exploited either prostitutes or young boys—sometimes both. The latter, coupled with the Greco-Roman “bathhouse” culture among men, were the reasons Paul writes what he writes about “homosexuality,” because it was exploiting and corrupting young men. (Similarly, the Old Testament prohibitions about “men lying with men” were condemning the Mid-Eastern practice of raping both men AND women, when conquering a foe, as a sign of dominance and degradation.) Most scholars believe that neither body of prohibitive texts were aimed at persons who simply had a “same sex” preference in terms of life partners, and even the early church left these folk alone.

 

The “had all things in common” text of Acts was more about survival and trying to assure that new-found faith “siblings” weren’t starving or struggling to subsist. Many of these early converts to Christ-following (remember, they weren’t called “Christians” until Antioch) were being ostracized by family and friends, be they Jewish “purists” or members of a pagan, cultish religion. The early church had a “thing” about caring for the “least of these,” and “loving thy neighbor as thyself,” that they had heard somewhere. No “doctrine” of Marxism arises in the church, nor to we read really anything else about this early attempt to meet needs by sharing resources “commonly.” It is clear that this “experiment” doesn’t survive the first century or so of the fledgling church. So you diehard capitalists don’t have to worry…unless you take the “love thy neighbor” and caring for “the least of these” seriously? Jesus didn’t say, “Go and become a socialist,” although socialism in some benign form is a legitimate way to keep people of lower means from starving. Today, we call it “Social Security.”

 

I had to get all of that out of the way because I knew you’d be thinking about it. Believers and their money (resources) are not easily parted. In fact, there is a whole “branch” of Christianity out there that supports the “blessings of wealth” line. You know, “your best life now” thing? Osteen is just the modern incarnation of “Rev. Ike,” a black preacher from my youth whom we used to watch on television. “Money LOVES me!”, he would proclaim, and “You can’t LOSE with the stuff I use!”, meaning that God wants “true believers” to be blessed financially. The good reverend used to tell his TV audiences that if they thought God wanted them to be the “humble poor,” they could send their money to HIM, because God wanted to bless HIM. Not bad work, if you can get it…

 

No, the word that caught my eye was “temple.” The text clearly says they spent “much time together in the temple.” So, the early “Christians” had a “Temple Tuesday”? As I mentioned earlier, the early Christ-followers were of all different religious ilks, including the first-century “nones,” however, most of them came from a Jewish background, since Jesus was himself a Jew. But this text says they did the temple stuff “together,” meaning it was an inclusive undertaking. A bit of research says that the temple “tolerated” and “hosted” these early gatherings, so as not to disenfranchise the many Christ-followers who practiced their Christianity as a subset of their Jewish faith. Just as the Essenes were a “sect” of Judaism, so many of the early Christians saw themselves in this regard. (The Essenes would have been welcomed into the temple, too, had they not been kind of xenophobic and hanging out in the desert.) This idea of “Temple Tuesday” fascinated me, especially in its apparent inclusiveness. Some commentaries said that the band of Christ-followers probably were welcomed into some of the meeting or common areas of the temple, since they were not all of Jewish heritage, but probably not into some of the specifically Jewish “worship” or Torah study parts of the complex. I can see this. 

 

Today, many of our churches (certainly some in survival mode) rent out “space” to community groups, or even other religious gatherings. Before I arrived on the scene, my first church had rented out the entire educational wing, which was not being used by the church, to a group from the local high school, that turned it into a giant, month-long, Halloween haunted house, as a fundraiser. I tactfully shut it down when I found out that the Christian TV station in a neighboring community was slandering the church for doing this (a fundamentalist view, for sure, but one that was certainly harmful PR for that local church, especially if we were to turn around its fortunes), AND when a brief study of the utilities costs of the haunted house showed that renting it out was showing a substantial deficit. Another of my congregations rented provided space for a group of charismatic Roman Catholics—they called themselves the “Children of God Community”—to meet, as they were not welcome to assemble in the local Catholic Church. It seems that the Vatican was more restrictive than the Methodists, if they weren’t sure if they “endorsed” the religious practices of one of their own “sects.” And while their theology wasn’t exactly Wesleyan, we went by the old John Wesley chestnut, “If your heart is of my heart (holding common ‘essential’ Christian beliefs), I give you the hand of fellowship.” Besides, they were really nice people, and their kids were classmates of our kids. 

 

This last part is my central point. Inclusiveness, which was a hallmark of Jesus and the early Christian movement, doesn’t have to mean we all believe exactly the same thing. Methodists, it turns out, latched on, thanks to Mr. Wesley, to this early church concept, and functioned as a VERY inclusive group, welcoming many “strangers” into our church AND ministering cooperatively with other believers whose doctrines were divergent from our own. That is, up until the various splits, schisms, and now this modern “disaffiliation” took hold. The Baptists are even worse. Thanks to numerous differences in doctrine, dogmatic “wars” among their preachers and theologians, and various schisms, there are over 100 different forms of “Baptists.” I don’t know how they keep things straight. 

 

On one hand, I have often defended the differing “denominations” of the Christian faith by suggesting that we all tend to “find our friends” at a party. If we’re into sewing, or cars, or reading good books, we will drift around until we find like-minded folk, among whom we are most comfortable. And people who are looking for a place to nurture their spirituality are like this, too. Hence, churches of various styles of worship, musical expression, and types of theological divergence have sprung up, and folk have affiliated, accordingly. I have tried to apply this same reasoning in order to come to terms with the disaffiliation that my denomination recently went through, but I find it hard to be tolerant, given the nasty—and often deceptive—tactics employed by those driving the movement. Secondarily, there has been a tendency for many who have disaffiliated to adopt the position that the United Methodist Church is “wrong” or “apostate” in its more inclusive stance, theologically, and claim the high ground of doctrinal correctness and “appropriate” scriptural “authority.” I really struggle with this tact, on their part. (Full disclosure: One of the most historic, heavily resourced, and beloved churches I served was persuaded to disaffiliate by my successor, who then became a member of the hierarchy in the “new” denomination.)

 

As I said in a recent sermon, quoting the late Rodney King, “Why can’t we all just get along?” It is clear from this text that both the early Christians AND even the Jewish temple did their best to live this kind of inclusive and tolerant faith perspective. The early church was more about sharing than power, more about living the teachings of Jesus than fighting over them, and more about being trustworthy than sorting out who had “more true” than the next person. If there is an “early church” concept I would like to see us emulate, it would be this “commonness” of faith and openness of fellowship. If there is any one who should be deeply grieved over what has transpired in the church down through history, it would be the Holy Spirit. Maybe it is time to look to another of the practices of these early believers?

 

That would be what this text says in verse 46: they “broke bread” in their homes together. Their homes was a “safe space” to develop meaningful relationships, apart from the antiseptic temple grounds. Oh, they had their “Temple Tuesdays” where they could maintain their former religious relationships, and probably get some good, historically based teachings, but the real growth of the early Christ-followers happened in their homes! And this formula worked quite well, as the Acts text tells us that goodwill abounded and was shared, and that “the Lord added many to their number of those who were saved.” God honored their inclusiveness, their hospitality, their open-hearted goodwill, and their compassion for each other, and their neighbors. That works, friends!

 

There is something about this “welding together” of the “Temple Tuesday” and the home-based fellowship and relationship building that we should rediscover, in my opinion. Our churches are seeing less and less folk “interested” in coming, and maybe it is because the “home” element has been lost? And I am aware that a number of efforts to start “home” churches have likewise failed or fell flat, either because some “big fish” in those little ponds attempted to dominate, or because the resources and more “formal” worship setting represented by the local church facility (and history) was excluded. Perhaps the “magic formula” of the church that God blessed was this marriage of institution AND home-based fellowship? I do know this: if less and less “believers” continue to eschew “Temple Tuesdays,” the institutional church is doomed, and probably within a couple of decades. Is Acts trying to warn the church that it takes two elements to build a sustainable religious community? The institutional church provides a safe, sane, and “educated” framework for Christians to grow, learn, and come together to serve the work of the Gospel. The home-based fellowship may be the “incarnational” entity that could welcome “seekers” and invitees into the faith, something we are beginning to miss out on. Just a few biblical thoughts this week as “grist for the mill.” Think about it. Amen.